Okie doke. But I still want a person in the cockpit and a real doctor doing heart surgery. Call me old fashioned...
Not almost the same, not even close. Flying a Level D simulator is really close to the real plane but even it is not the same. There is a reason there are minimum flight time requirements/aeronautical experience before a pilot can use a Level D sim for certification.HAL,
With all the automation going on in today's airlines, I'd say that the line is starting to blur. Certainly hands on flying is different than flying a UAV, but automation has brought the two very close to being the same.
Won't happen for a whole lot of reasons. Someday it might go to 1 pilot, but pax will never be unmanned.I am sure if unmanned flights became as reliable as manned flights and became more cost efficient, people would begin to change their mind. Most new concepts, especially ones that could affect your life in a majorly negative way, are going to be initially feared and distrusted for understandable reasons.
Heck, last time I thought I might end up in the drink, there was no "ground" to be had afterwards, just nonskid.I get the feeling that pilots would be paid and promoted more by airline management and Navy promotion board members respectively if those individuals ever got to experience a flight where the shit hits the fan and they question their own survival before they kiss the ground they walk on when the flights over.
This is more of a problem in Japan, Korea and 3rd world countries. But the answer is not more automation, especially to the extent of UAVs. The answer is ensuring pilots keep their stick & rudder skills up to speed.
There is a big difference between flying a manned aircraft and flying a UAV.
With all the automation going on in today's airlines, I'd say that the line is starting to blur.
A manned aircraft pilot who relies on automation is an accident waiting to happen.
And I don't see how you think my post made your point.
You can not go from takeoff to landing without touching the stick.I didn't say that automation was the answer...but it is taking over the commercial airline business. My point is that there is A LOT of automation in commercial air from takeoff to landing a lot of pilots don't even touch the stick; similar to flying UAVs. Then there's this.
Heck, last time I thought I might end up in the drink, there was no "ground" to be had afterwards, just nonskid.And I'm no ace, just second schmuck from the left . . .
Won't happen for a whole lot of reasons. Someday it might go to 1 pilot, but pax will never be unmanned.
Even if the systems were 100% fool proof, the insurance industry would never allow it.
But there is too much that can go wrong that a machine/computer can not react too. Things like electrical faults, etc.
I have taken an extremely unscientific poll from time to time when talking with people about aviation- most people (military/civilian- doesn't matter) would fly with 1 pilot, but nobody would fly with a fully automatic flight station. As soon as they figure out how to make it 1 pilot, its going to happen.