The DHS Secretary seems to really be in touch with everything going on. Who among us hasn't felt joy in the saddle of an Argentinian-bred horse?This was my first thought as well. It's sad DHS is barely believable in their current incarnation.
I guess we've gone past the logical and pragmatic benefit-of-the-doubt stage. I was attempting to draw an analogy and parallels for those who have to execute time-critical thinking skills and deduce some reasonable explanations from the scenario we were discussing.I'm not sure where your getting that because that's not what I'm saying at all dude. Also, warzone military actions vs civilian police action against American citizens. That's an important distinction you're ignoring.
If the pilot/perp had an inkling he was going to be arrested…is that on the ORM checklist?Do you know when the warrant was issued? Inflight perhaps? Before take off? We have no idea.
THIS. The other pilot is probably thanking his lucky stars.If the pilot/perp had an inkling he was going to be arrested…is that on the ORM checklist?
He wouldn’t be the first pedophile to decide to finish things on his own terms.
It was not a fed investigation. Sheriff's office was investigating sex with a minor for weeks and they asked DHS for an assist.We're also not conducting wartime operations against American citizens. That is a critical distinction.
There are times when the cops need to gear up. I can't see a case in which this is one. Flight risk? He can only run so far, and he can't out-run a radio. Harm to others? With what? He's not carrying.
Also, why is DHS conducting this and not the FBI? Kiddy porn investigations don't seem to fit inside the DHS's scope of operations. That seems more like a DOJ job.
And if they think he's going to do some type of 9/11 attack, why not stop him before he took off?
This screams security theater to me.