That's what the PARFQ is for.I thought passing BCA before the PRT was intended for the Navy to cover its ass in case ppl have a heart attack during the evolution. This would seem to undermine that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's what the PARFQ is for.I thought passing BCA before the PRT was intended for the Navy to cover its ass in case ppl have a heart attack during the evolution. This would seem to undermine that.
That's bullshit, as that part of your audiology exam isn't part of your aeromedical clearance.
“Kidney infection?”While I have ranted here before about basic VA care, I have appreciated the ability to pop over to an urgent care to get lab tests several times this year, at no cost to me. (And no, the tests were not for gonorrhea).
I'd just love if the audiology people could adopt a similar change. Every year now, I go back a second time so I can just barely pass enough for them to not "re baseline" me. Next year I have already decided that I'm not going back and will order them to re-baseline me, and probably die on that hill if needed. I have actually noticed hearing loss. It isn't just a bad test. Too bad for them I guess. I wear the foamies correctly under my helmet. It just is what it is. Not gonna waste another fly day of drills a year getting mindlessly retested and somehow "passing", and being a hostage to their stupid rice bowl program that adds no value or readiness to naval aviation.
Curious about your experience on that. My understanding is that service connected hearing loss is assessed from original baseline thresholds, and you won't get a rating unless your hearing loss is fairly severe. The reason Occ Health wants to rebaseline is so they can assess recent trends to see if there's something in your hearing protection approach that can be tweaked, which isn't all that useful for those of us in aircraft already wearing all the available PPE.Doing a rebaseline can potentially be beneficial when you get out.
The military needs to invest in noise cancelling headset technology for fliers.Curious about your experience on that. My understanding is that service connected hearing loss is assessed from original baseline thresholds, and you won't get a rating unless your hearing loss is fairly severe. The reason Occ Health wants to rebaseline is so they can assess recent trends to see if there's something in your hearing protection approach that can be tweaked, which isn't all that useful for those of us in aircraft already wearing all the available PPE.
Maybe. I'm later 40s, 2.5k hours, mostly in helps, lots of time on CVN flight deck, and I still get mostly -5 dB across the hearing exam. I've been wearing basic (non-molded) CEPs since 2009.The military needs to invest in noise cancelling headset technology for fliers.
I'm perhaps not up to speed on all the physics, but is noise cancellation applicable to hearing protection, or is it more for crew comfort and being able to hear ICS and the radio? Is phase cancellation as effective as attenuation in preventing hearing damage? Also, WRT to jet noise, the worst environments seem to be outside the cockpit, I.E. flight deck crews, etc.Maybe. I'm later 40s, 2.5k hours, mostly in helps, lots of time on CVN flight deck, and I still get mostly -5 dB across the hearing exam. I've been wearing basic (non-molded) CEPs since 2009.
If there's data to show noise canceling beats properly fitted double-protection, then I guess. I certainly think helo aircrewmen and flight deck personnel are more at risk than most aviators. I also suspect there's a genetic component to hearing loss.
Curious about your experience on that. My understanding is that service connected hearing loss is assessed from original baseline thresholds, and you won't get a rating unless your hearing loss is fairly severe. The reason Occ Health wants to rebaseline is so they can assess recent trends to see if there's something in your hearing protection approach that can be tweaked, which isn't all that useful for those of us in aircraft already wearing all the available PPE.
Maybe. I'm later 40s, 2.5k hours, mostly in helps, lots of time on CVN flight deck, and I still get mostly -5 dB across the hearing exam. I've been wearing basic (non-molded) CEPs since 2009.
If there's data to show noise canceling beats properly fitted double-protection, then I guess. I certainly think helo aircrewmen and flight deck personnel are more at risk than most aviators. I also suspect there's a genetic component to hearing loss.
I'm perhaps not up to speed on all the physics, but is noise cancellation applicable to hearing protection, or is it more for crew comfort and being able to hear ICS and the radio? Is phase cancellation as effective as attenuation in preventing hearing damage?
The military needs to invest in noise cancelling headset technology for fliers.
Along the lines of what you're saying, I think the type of exposure matters. With around ~3.3K hours of turbine time at the time of retirement, I had minimal loss, but more than 1K of that was sitting behind a PT-6, and that absolutely caused significant tinnitus. Once I stopped flying that and went back to helos the tinnitus subsided (but didn't disappear).
But there's other variables too. My helo helmet, as crappy as it is for NVGs, fit me really well for hearing, along with using foamies 100% of the time. My fixed-wing helmet wasn't as good (also mitigated with foamies). I'm not sure if its fit was truly causing more damage than would have happened anyway, though, just because that engine was so damn loud and running at 100% 80 percent of the time.
I agree, I would guess the crewmen take more of the brunt of helo flying with that tranny over their head all the time.