• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Bye Bye Airforce

raptor10

Philosoraptor
Contributor
taken from aerospace daily

Acting U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England is expected to propose killing the Air Force variant of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and directing the Air Force to buy the Navy's carrier variant (CV) instead, according to a well-connected defense expert.
In a one-page "issue brief" and in an interview Nov. 18, Loren Thompson, chief operating officer of the Lexington Institute, predicted that England, who is also Navy secretary, will present his proposal at a Nov. 21 high-level meeting that is supposed to weigh in on the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review.
Thompson, who attributed his information to unnamed senior Pentagon and industry officials, said the reasoning for England's proposal is unclear, "other than the overwhelming presence of sea-service alumni in QDR deliberations." Dropping the Air Force's conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) variant would save no money, at least through the end of the decade, and it would force the Air Force to buy the heavier CV version, which it does not want, Thompson asserted.
Killing the CTOL variant also would "enrage" several U.S. allies who have been planning to buy the CTOL variant and have contributed billions of dollars to JSF's development, Thompson said.
"Eliminating it means walking away from the global aircraft markets that America has dominated for two generations," he said.
During the week of Dec. 5 in Baltimore, officials from the United States and JSF's eight foreign-partner nations are scheduled to hold their final round of negotiations on an agreement that will, among other things, indicate the number of aircraft each country will buy (DAILY, Nov. 7).
England's office did not respond to a request for comment on Thompson's prediction. Spokesmen for the Air Force and JSF prime contractor Lockheed Martin declined to comment.
Current plans call for the Air Force to buy 1,763 F-35s, though the Air Force has proposed trimming that figure by several hundred aircraft. The Marine Corps and Navy would get a total of 680 jets, with the Marine Corps getting its own short-takeoff-and-vertical-landing (STOVL) version.
Thompson said that other major programs, including the Army's Future Combat Systems and the Navy's DD(X) destroyer, also could be overhauled due to budget constraints.

I can only imagine that the reason behind it is to lower costs for the F-35C so that the navy will be able to buy more.
 

BarrettRC8

VMFA
pilot
How old is this information? I've heard this a few months ago but then it was decided that the Air Force would continue its previous plans with the CTOL version.
 

Fmr1833

Shut the F#%k up, dummy!
None
Contributor
Pretty old info. Nice try, though.

The weekend after England suggested to Congress that CTOL be killed, a coalition of Congressmen, Lockheed cntractors and other nations convinced him to back down as noted in this article from 27 NOV 2005. Since then the CTOL JSF variant has remained online.

http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/11285p2.xml

The Aerospace daily article you quoted was from 21 Nov 2005, kind of old to be putting it out there as current fact IMHO.
 

Schnugg

It's gettin' a bit dramatic 'round here...
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
It would be great for parts pricing to have more similar copies of the JSF produced. Would the Navy share parts with the USAF, or vice versa? No. But parts costs would be lower as with any multi purchase buy.
 
Top