I always liked "Flight of the Intruder". Seemed more "realistic" to a pre-teen head full-o-cottage cheese.
I think there will be a party when the 60B goes away, but they are treating it like a whole new bird, not just an overdue upgrade.
Just curious, was it treated as a huge deal when squadrons upgraded from A-6As to A-6Bs or A4E to A4F?
I thought Coontz's book "Flight of the Intruder" was about the most realistic portrayal of night low levels I've ever seen published.
My first fleet squadron had, at one time, KA-6D tankers, A6E STARM (standard arm birds on the old A6E platform), A6E TRAM and A6E TRAM/FLIR, essentially three different models (The TRAM birds were simply awaiting the FLIR components). The guys at China Lake did a year long road show in advance of the TRAM/FLIR introduction, but the fleet introduction was downplayed because VA-115, forward deployed on USS Midway, got the first ones and had them for over a year before the second fleet squadron got them, so it was old news once the CONUS squadrtns had them.
By the way, a short sea story and lessons learned, our four STARM birds were the last in the fleet, and the TRAM/FLIR birds couldn't shoot STARMs, so these were precious assets, as were the missiles themselves. During the Iranian Hostage Crisis in '79 and '80, and the first year of the IRAN/IRAQ war, we carried a live STARM missile on over half the flights. One night on Gonzo Station, one of our nuggets went single engine (and the lessons learned that were subsequently applied to NATOPS procedures were numbered in the ten's) and ultimately lost control of the airplane after a wave off and dumped it into the sea. The crew got out okay, but the plane was never recovered. However, a huge causal factor, one we aviators weren't aware of, was that on "non-threat hops," the powers that be in DC had required that the launchers carrying the STARM missiles be incapacitated so that this 'critical asset' couldn't be jettisoned under any circumstance. That was almost 2000 lbs you were stuck with, as our crew found out. That rule was immediately changed, as you can guess.
Another major NATOPS change that affected the EA-6B guys as well, was that previously NATOPS called for us to shut down an engine if you got an 80% oil light and relight it prior to landing. The A6 will run with almost no oil, but checklists are checklists, so when our nugget crew got an 80% light at midnight, the O-4 rep in Air Ops told them to shut it down until marshal. They never got a relight because the checklist didn't advise that it could take up to 60 seconds to light it off, and the crew was only giving it about 20-30 seconds, and essentially flooded the engine. Also, the LSO's weren't advised of the single engine approach until a mile and a half on final. The lessons learned go on and on.