Who's sorry now?? You decide:
General Anthony Zinni gets undiplomatic treatment from Obama team ...
General Anthony Zinni gets undiplomatic treatment from Obama team ...
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
General Zinni gets dissed ... ???
- Thread starter A4sForever
- Start date
Who's sorry now?? You decide:
General Anthony Zinni gets undiplomatic treatment from Obama team ...
All of us?
Changing their mind about him being the ambassador is not a huge deal, but the way they did was very inept. Hopefully this trend doesn't continue.
The man deserves a phone call, no doubt about that. He was only putting his entire life back on hold to go back into the service of his country.
So who dropped the ball? Is it the ethos of the new organization, or did one person (perhaps Gen. Jones) just screw the pooch? I wouldn't even blow off the loser in the bid to take care of my dogs the way they did him.
m0tbaillie
Former SWO
Sounds like we're only hearing one side of the story. Also, I doubt a retired general was really "putting his entire life on hold" waiting for a phone call...that seems a bit over-dramatized to me...
Considering he was planning to move his entire life to Iraq, I'd be willing to bet that he had a lot of things up in the air---wouldn't you?
I've met Gen. Zinni multiple times. A truly great man with an incredible understanding of the Middle Eastern culture.
He is an experienced bureaucrat…I mean diplomat.
He has no experience in the middle east whatsoever
Wiki bio:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_R._Hill
Well, his last name is "Hill".
Career diplomat within the Foreign Service. Think he spent couple of years in Black Shoe Navy, not sure. Met him several times at State in meetings on export controls.
Is a stand-up guy, smart and well liked. He is not an ideologue.
As far as selection - Hill vs Zinni; the old sage "it ain't over till it is over" applies aptly to any promise of a job in the politico sphere, Mr. Zinni should have known that.
In my view, C. Hill is a far better choice; a senior military guy is the last thing we need representing the US in Iraq at this point in time.
I don't get that logic.
When you consider that we have a little military operation going on in the country, having someone running the largest US Embassy in the world who knows the "lingo" might be to our advantage. A retired military officer with experience in the region and with the culture is pertty damn important.
Iraq is not a place where you send a guy who has spent his entire career in another part of the world to round out his resume. We need someone there with relationships already in place and someone who understands how things work.
A military operation which is dwindling in size and influence over the shape of events in Iraq. Putting a military man in charge of diplomacy will set the wrong tone when our relationship is becoming less and less predicated on our military presence.
Mr. Hill has a strong track record from the Bosnia peace settlement and as the US rep to the six-party talks with North Korea. It's insulting to demean him as a bureaucrat "rounding out his resume". You might as well call Gen. Zinni a "manager"; it'd be about as accurate.
Mr. Hill has a strong track record from the Bosnia peace settlement and as the US rep to the six-party talks with North Korea. It's insulting to demean him as a bureaucrat "rounding out his resume". You might as well call Gen. Zinni a "manager"; it'd be about as accurate.