I'm dying to hear this story.Deke999999 said:VT-6 VT-9 VAQ-129
Winged Jan 25, 2005
Ready to depart for Cherry Pit, NC
75 hours in type, 4 field arrestments before I had 10 hours in type lol
Deke
Brett
I'm dying to hear this story.Deke999999 said:VT-6 VT-9 VAQ-129
Winged Jan 25, 2005
Ready to depart for Cherry Pit, NC
75 hours in type, 4 field arrestments before I had 10 hours in type lol
Deke
Deke999999 said:Second flight driving old girl and we get a weight on wheels switch failure. Take the short field precautionary style. Get out man up a new jet, go over Smith to "adjust" gross weight to do the same pattern hop. Finish up over Smith and go to configure for the ACLS to 13, stab fails to shift and the flaps wont come down, but the slats are out. Interesting configuration senario for the guy with 3 hours in type. Few flights later have a main mount that won't lock up, precationary trap with associated hyd leak found on shutdown. Next flight have a main mount that comes partially down during maneuvering. I also took one for raising the gear handle and nothing happening, not even a transition light. One other but I forget why, not a huge deal but it fell under precationary. NATOPS is well used in daily ops for a Prowler crew.
Deke
I know 129's jets are AFU, but that is ridiculous. That's like a whole tour's worth of configuration malfunctions squeezed into a few days. How did you resolve your slats out/stab fails to shift configuration? Were you able to clean up for a no flaps/no slats landing?Deke999999 said:Second flight driving old girl and we get a weight on wheels switch failure. Take the short field precautionary style. Get out man up a new jet, go over Smith to "adjust" gross weight to do the same pattern hop. Finish up over Smith and go to configure for the ACLS to 13, stab fails to shift and the flaps wont come down, but the slats are out. Interesting configuration senario for the guy with 3 hours in type. Few flights later have a main mount that won't lock up, precationary trap with associated hyd leak found on shutdown. Next flight have a main mount that comes partially down during maneuvering. I also took one for raising the gear handle and nothing happening, not even a transition light. One other but I forget why, not a huge deal but it fell under precationary. NATOPS is well used in daily ops for a Prowler crew.
Deke
Brett327 said:I know 129's jets are AFU, but that is ridiculous. That's like a whole tour's worth of configuration malfunctions squeezed into a few days. How did you resolve your slats out/stab fails to shift configuration? Were you able to clean up for a no flaps/no slats landing?
Brett
I sure do. Didn't some new guy lineshack guy service the PON-6 with the wrong thing? If memory serves, they caught it before any aircraft got serviced. That could have gone bad really fast. Assuming(big assumption, but hey...) a regular top-off would effectively ruin the engine's entire oil supply and result in engine failures inflight, an enterprising PC could service 4-5 jets with said PON-6. Assuming both engines were serviced, that could have taken out a sh!tload of Prowlers in one fell swoop.SteveG75 said:Well Brett, at least he didn't have antifreeze in the oil. Remember that RAG snafu?
Brett327 said:I sure do. Didn't some new guy lineshack guy service the PON-6 with the wrong thing? If memory serves, they caught it before any aircraft got serviced. That could have gone bad really fast. Assuming(big assumption, but hey...) a regular top-off would effectively ruin the engine's entire oil supply and result in engine failures inflight, an enterprising PC could service 4-5 jets with said PON-6. Assuming both engines were serviced, that could have taken out a sh!tload of Prowlers in one fell swoop.
Brett
Brett327 said:I sure do. Didn't some new guy lineshack guy service the PON-6 with the wrong thing? If memory serves, they caught it before any aircraft got serviced. That could have gone bad really fast. Assuming(big assumption, but hey...) a regular top-off would effectively ruin the engine's entire oil supply and result in engine failures inflight, an enterprising PC could service 4-5 jets with said PON-6. Assuming both engines were serviced, that could have taken out a sh!tload of Prowlers in one fell swoop.
Brett