devildogdad said:
I would like to know from those AVIATORS out there how you personally feel about what you fly and why you chose what you did and the Pros and Cons of flying your particular aircraft.
when i was at Whiting i didn't really know what i wanted to fly but it’s best not to say anything anyways as some of the IP’s there will hold it against you if you want Jets. the reason why Primary flight school has no Fighter/Attack pilots as instructors is because it’s a career ender for them, not to mention if you must go back to the training command and be an instructor, as least go fly tactically in the T-45. not having any Fighter/Attack pilots in Primary hurts though because nobody is there to dispel any of the rumors about the flying Jets, so students buy into the false statements made by instructors there who know very little about the Fighter/Attack side of the house. i've been flying the Hornet for a few years now, here are some Pros & Cons in my opinion ...
Pros of flying the Hornet:
- first and foremost flying one of the world's best Fighter/Attack aircraft
- the different types of missions, i.e. one day you might be flying a 1v1 or 2v2 dogfighting against other Hornets or Air Force F-16s or F-15s, the next day you might be practicing Close Air Support with Marines on the ground, and the next day you might be apart of a division (4 Hornets) self escort strike being aggressed by unknown fighters. we do low alitude training though we don't fly as low as Helos. the Marine Corps limits Hornets to 300 feet above the ground during training (for safety), but maneuvering at 300 feet and 500 knots is pretty cool.
here's video from a low altitude Pop-up attack flight i did from a couple years ago ...
Popup Attack ... it's approx 6MB, if you have problems viewing you probably need
Divx Codec added to your Windows Media Player
- the ability to fly faster than the speed of sound
- the slow speed capabilities of the Hornet
- being the Pilot in Command and not having to share flighttime (i fly the single seat variant of the Hornet)
- working with Marines on the ground doing Close Air Support ... i have yet to work with the Navy other than attending their schools. unless you deploy on a Navy ship (Carrier or LHD), you don't do much work with the Navy)
- landing & taking off of an Aircraft Carrier (though i haven't done that since the RAG)
- the other Fighter/Attack pilots that I work with on a daily basis … most everybody is pretty laid back and professional, and is willing teach you rather than "haze" you because you are new to the squadron. and there's not very many "high n tight haircut, oo-rah devil dog types" to be found in the Hornet community. from day one as a 1stLt, you are calling the other Company Grade Officers by their callsigns, and not calling them "sir". it's a laid back yet professional community
- there is always something to learn, either by studying or by listening to briefs & lectures. that is what turns a lot of people off to Jets, always having something to learn or study. but nobody holds your hand, either you learn on your own or lack of knowledge will show when you go flying.
- going on cross-countries and to airshows (ties into the "sex appeal")
Cons:
- long work hours … it’s not a 9 to 5 job
- never can get enough flight time ... 10-20 hours a month, depending on where your squadron is in the training cycle is the norm, but more would always be better. but for those planning ahead and looking to fly commercially in the civilian world, airlines have a conversion rate for Jet pilots which balances everything out. each airlines has a different conversion rate.
- Marine Hornets are getting old (as with all of Marine aircraft), which equates to more maintenance issues which means more broken jets, which equates to less flighttime
any questions feel free to ask ... good luck to your Son
Semper Fidelis