I was not "accelerated" per se in the HT's. I honestly think there are so few helo pilots that come thru, that it is not worth making a policy for them.
Anyways, in the HT's I would double-pump, and fly when the weather was questionable. I could knock out 2 flights worth of events because I did not need as much time to hit the standards. But they could not cut too much off, because I would not have enough hours that way.
Single pilot vs. Navy style.
I think it is BS that you cannot change a radio or scratch your butt without having the other pilot do it or executing a change of controls. I am used to flying with no body else in the aircraft. Honestly, some things, I would rather be solo. Crew coordination is good, but the whole "you cant take your hands off the controls-EVER" is not exactly inspiring confidence in the airframe for the nuggets.
In a hover, trying to land, below a certain altitude. Yeah, both hands. Switching button 8 going into spencer? The trim/friction will hold long enough for you to change it, or you had it trimmed wrong. 57B's can be trimmed for a hands off hover, provided the winds are stable.
Heck, the 60 can be flown single pilot. The only manuver I actually NEED the other pilot for is cutting the PCLs for a loss of drive. Anything else, I can do by myself. On my level 300 ATO check, my pilot "died" and I flew the last 20 minutes single pilot while running the tactical systems & hellfire. (Rad alt on, left hand on cyclic, right hand on HCU). Hard as hell, but can be done.
The biggest thing I saw wrong with flight training was that some stuff that was in the NATOPS was iffy at best, if not flat out wrong versus the Bell manuals for the same AC, and god help you if you tried to fix that.