Just saw this story online: http://www.king5.com/news/steel-bridge-skokomish-river-100949169.html.
Looks like some insane flying!
Looks like some insane flying!
No coughs about it, that was Shit Hot!FOX local Miami affiliate gave repeated kudos to USN's helo (cough,cough) pilots out of Whidbey.
Here is the follow up.Just saw this story online: http://www.king5.com/news/steel-bridge-skokomish-river-100949169.html.
Looks like some insane flying!
Not to be the lone dissenting opinion, but was taking that girl out in the water and having her spin 10-20 times on the way up, while hovering under a bridge the safest way to execute that rescue?
If it was necessary, then kudos to the crew.
If it was necessary, then kudos to the crew.
Have you ever been hoisted? You spin a few times.
I imagine: Spinning << Hypothermia/Death
bt123 said on August 19, 2010 at 10:31 AM
Now for the dissenting comment: having worked in and around helicopters for 10 years and in mountain rescue for over two decades, it appears that this rescue was executed very carelessly. Granted the report may not be entirely accurate, but if it is everybody within shrapnel distance of the chopper could easily have been seriously injured or worse. Neither the subject's life nor limb(s) were threatened and the ground crew was already in place to haul the subject with a very safe rigging system. The air crew didn't communicate with the ground team(s) and flew into a "box" with the only exit due aft; completely blind. Any wind shear, up/down drafts or mechanical flight-equipment interruption and this mission could have ended very badly, including the loss of the multimillion dollar helicopter and all of the flight training hours we taxpayers have funded. While in a combat situation such a risk might well be justified, even a very skilled civilian pilot would very likely be grounded