This idea is rather unpractical. The concept was around in the 80's and was unfeasible then.
This might be a decent idea for smaller feeder ships, but they mainly operate coastal, and the amount of traffic would not allow for this type of technology to be used.
The size of ships being built today also make the rather ridiculous. When you have ships like Emma Maersk being built, which are bigger than our aircraft carriers, a puny sail won't do much. After being on ships with 3 story engines I find it hard to buy this, especially how much horsepower is required.
I know its wikipedia, but is a good summary
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Mærsk
There are also other considerations such as traffic out at sea and maintenace of these sails especially in the days of minimal crewing.
To echo off kejo, the US shipbuilding industry is down the tubes.
A lot of new builds for deep sea are mainly Navy contracts. NASSCO out in San Diego is a big builder with a fair number of contracts. They also have a few civilian contracts, mainly with BP building tankers for the Alaska-California run. What helps keep shipyards in business is the Jones Act. If a ship is to be operated from a US port to US port and back again, or operates inland the ship has to be US built and US crewed. A foreign ship can visit several US ports, in one stint, it just cant take cargo from say Oakland to Seattle.