Not really a variant, per se, just designed by the same dudes (Ed Heinemann and his band at Douglas) in the same era for a lot of the same requirements.Looks like a variant of an F3D
![]()
Not really a variant, per se, just designed by the same dudes (Ed Heinemann and his band at Douglas) in the same era for a lot of the same requirements.Looks like a variant of an F3D
![]()
The 2 airfoils at the aft bottom: any info on how they operated?The loser (to the F4H) in the 1958 fighter competition. Vought F8U-3. "The best fighter that the Navy never bought."
View attachment 42646View attachment 42647
Estimated at a very fast 490 mph; but at the same time a lightened P-47J with a more powerful Pratt R-2800 hit a blistering 504 mph.Performance specs?
One of the meanest fighter designs, Ever!Vought F8U-3
For a Saturday night: how would the Navy’s Corsairs and Hellcats do against the Luftwaffe’s ME-109s and FW-190s?
Sorry to quote Tom Cruise, but it’s not the aircraft, it’s the pilot! The average naval aviator of late ‘44 or early ‘45 would have had vastly more experience than the average Luftwaffe pilot. An interesting way to look at it this…the P-51 (and good pilots) proved to be a superior design to German models but the Corsair proved to be superior to the P-51 during the “Football War!” On a more serious note, you can read about the Navy’s analysis (1944) of the two aircraft from the Pax River team here, https://militaryhistorynow.com/2021...-up-between-the-two-fighters/#google_vignette it briefly notes testing that was done against some axis fighters…both the Corsair and Hellcat could turn inside the German models, something the P-51 could not do.A very interesting question... my gut feeling is that the Hellcat would not have done very well against the Luftwaffe. The Corsair probably better. It was a very different air war in the ETO compared to the Pacific. If the war had lasted longer, the Marine Tigercats and the Navy Bearcats would have done pretty well.