• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Road to 350: What Does the US Navy Do Anyway?

Griz882

Griz882

Frightening children with the Griz-O-Copter!
pilot
Contributor
N

number9

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Hair Warrior said:
Not really a fan of this. There are a lot of charlatans in tech sector C-Suites, for starters. If they can already join today at O1-O3, what’s stopping them from joining? It’s not the pay. If we really need their skills and they truly refuse to spend any time as a JO, make a civilian auxiliary or bring them in as a part-time contractor.

We just tried an experiment where a tech genius was plucked from industry and placed into a senior govt role straight from the tech sector - he thought it was a good idea to put a rogue Starlink dish on a certain roof and transmit USG data without permission. It wasn’t great.

And if some senior officer is telling me that these private sector execs can’t do what they need to do with “only” two bars instead of a silver oak leaf, then maybe they’re the problem and they should listen to their JOs more often. Heck, there are already a bunch of JOs in the reserves who are executives at tech companies who should automatically jump up to O4 or O5 instantly based on this criteria (I know a few), but once you’re in the system you’re stuck in the wickets with everyone else. And that isn’t a bad thing - it gives you time to learn and grow within the correct system.

Notable exceptions:
- Doctors, dentists, nurses
- William S Knudson
- Joseph Francis Carroll

They’re the exceptions that prove the rule, though. A top cardiologist at a US hospital is going to follow the same medical training and adhere to the same ethical process as a military cardiologist. The same cannot be said for an executive at Instagram understanding DoD information systems, classification levels, ethical constraints, or cyberspace operations.
Click to expand...
I think this was a well-intentioned good idea that gets worse and worse when you start putting it on paper.

Do we need a F500 CTO to tell us that the the military is bad at building software? No. Are any of them going to propose radical change that is counter to their shareholders' best interest? Also no.

That being said, it will be wild to see an O-5 without a ribbon. Not even the NDSM...
 
Lawman

Lawman

Well-Known Member
None
Flash said:
Why do they need to be in uniform? They could easily do this sort of job as a civilian or in advisory capacity. As a matter of fact there are several entities that already exist to do just what they are supposed to be doing. And them being in mid-grade officers would even put them at a disadvantage, if they were going to be in the real Army.
Click to expand...
Total authorizations of SES positions and the way money and contracting works. The current technology director to the Chief of Staff is an SWS-2. He was an Intel contractor for the military in his earlier life and then went to Palantir. Dude has a 1 star that works for him. He could just as easily been a 2 star and just stayed in the acquisitions sector but the Army holds that position for one of its SES slots specifically.

This has precedent back to events like WWII. We made people Col’s and Generals but gave them none of the commander roles, they were project leaders. William Knudson probably being one of the best examples of going from the stratified position in industry direct to a stratified position within the War Department at the time. Dude was a 3 star but nobody was expecting him to command troops. He was directing the infrastructure necessary to feed the war.
 
Hair Warrior

Hair Warrior

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Lawman said:
Total authorizations of SES positions and the way money and contracting works.
Click to expand...
Nah, this isn’t the reason. There are plenty of noncareer SES vacancies right now. It’s the fact that these execs don’t want to quit their day jobs where they make plenty of money to do a stint as an SES (where you have to file financial disclosures, and other strings attached).

I wonder how long it will take before these new Lt Cols are given involuntary mob orders activating them to the Pentagon for a year. If they want to lend their skills, and we need their skills immediately, well, use that mechanism and put their skills to use.
 
BigRed389

BigRed389

Registered User
None
Lawman said:
Total authorizations of SES positions and the way money and contracting works. The current technology director to the Chief of Staff is an SWS-2. He was an Intel contractor for the military in his earlier life and then went to Palantir. Dude has a 1 star that works for him. He could just as easily been a 2 star and just stayed in the acquisitions sector but the Army holds that position for one of its SES slots specifically.

This has precedent back to events like WWII. We made people Col’s and Generals but gave them none of the commander roles, they were project leaders. William Knudson probably being one of the best examples of going from the stratified position in industry direct to a stratified position within the War Department at the time. Dude was a 3 star but nobody was expecting him to command troops. He was directing the infrastructure necessary to feed the war.
Click to expand...
In war, or a real serious face prep for war, we could crank up SES or other billet authorizations with the stroke of a pen.

I mean sure, we do this for doctors and other specialties where we have very specific functions for them but nobody is expecting a doctor to ever do anything but doctor things.

If the idea is to bring them in to do industry things though, it’s not quite the same, because the point of having folks with operational experience in procurement and R&D commands is that they at least have some clue what the hell the field conditions of the things will be like. That’s about the only real (but very key) difference between a civilian and uniformed person in acquisition…and we dont always even do that. See the USAF full time acquisition types that have never deployed or done any time with an operational command.

Which is what annoys me about this - throwing this as a solution while the DOD is simultaneously cutting FOGO and SES billets, and chopped the civilian workforce (also support contractors to an extent,)…then saying do more (Golden Dome), followed by this idea just comes across as incoherent workforce management strategy.
 
Swanee

Swanee

Cereal Killer
pilot
None
Contributor
PhrogPhlyer said:
Not bad, civilian to LtCol.
Wonder how they will get brough up to speed on actually being part of the military.
Click to expand...

It's just a pay grade for them. IMHO we're going to see this continue in the cyber squadrons. You can't attract the talent needed in the traditional military recruitment model.

It's a great place for the restricted line officer corps.
 
Lawman

Lawman

Well-Known Member
None
Swanee said:
It's just a pay grade for them. IMHO we're going to see this continue in the cyber squadrons. You can't attract the talent needed in the traditional military recruitment model.

It's a great place for the restricted line officer corps.
Click to expand...
More particularly we can’t apply military standards to those people and expect it to take. The metrics for making rank don’t work in specialty support fields.

I don’t care what dudes PT score or last rifle range was. I want him to take the IADS down for 6 hours with a computer. Let him have whatever hair and uniform standards he wants, his grade is just a paycheck.
 
BigRed389

BigRed389

Registered User
None
Lawman said:
More particularly we can’t apply military standards to those people and expect it to take. The metrics for making rank don’t work in specialty support fields.

I don’t care what dudes PT score or last rifle range was. I want him to take the IADS down for 6 hours with a computer. Let him have whatever hair and uniform standards he wants, his grade is just a paycheck.
Click to expand...
Well…apparently Army already did it. 4 guys from the Silicon Valley C-suite commissioned as O5s. One of them is Shyam Shankar, CTO of Palantir. I don’t think anybody will say they don’t have the street cred, though I still don’t get the point.

Those guys could do as much, if not more, as a SES or Special Government Employee.

Also…I probably don’t want to be the O5 that ever has to compete with those guys on a promotion board
 
PhrogPhlyer

PhrogPhlyer

Two heads are better than one.
pilot
None
Lawman said:
More particularly we can’t apply military standards to those people and expect it to take. The metrics for making rank don’t work in specialty support fields.
Click to expand...
BigRed389 said:
Those guys could do as much, if not more, as a SES or Special Government Employee.
Click to expand...
Why not do as we did for the Manhattan Project?
Brought together the greatest minds in Physics, Chemistry, Engineering, etc. and changed the world.
And they did it without direct commissions.
Why do Teckies need to be given a military rank?
Is this similar to a participation prize, you're on the team so you get the O-5 trophy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top