Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The way that I read that example is that the looser pays is that how you read it?
You shoot some one and get sued. You are the defendant and the guy you shot or his survivors are the plaintiffs. If judge or jury determines you were justified under 776.032 (1) the plaintiff must pay your costs. I looks like you don't have to go to a jury and win, but even if the court issues a directed verdict or grants a motion for summery judgment ( more or less "thrown out" in layman's terms) you still get costs.
That wouldn't be a bad thing for ALL lawsuits. Maybe we wouldn't be such a lawsuit happy country?
) The lawsuit was their chance to hit the lottery. So in the end, judgment or not, the defendant gets no money to reimburse himself for the cost of defending himself. Even the plaintiff's attorney frequently get stuck holding the bag when his clients can't pay the costs of their own litigation in the end. Remember, it isn't completely cost free to bring a lawsuit. The lawyer may take a 30% contingency fee if they win, but the client still has to pay for all of his court costs, expert witnesses, investigators, litigation support and depositions regardless of winning or losing.