Yes, but there are certainly older photos of F-5Es floating about on the internet, thus my question.
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
Stupid Questions about Naval Aviation (Part 3)
- Thread starter Top_Gun_1_0_1
- Start date
AircraftGeek513
Active Member
Stupid question: I heard that they combined the Rhino and Growler NATOPS into one manual. Is this true or was someone feeding me BS?
Yes, that happened around 3 years ago. It is the same "qual" now, annually. There are some annotated "EF" or "G" differences, where a procedure only applies to one and not the other, and the bingo tables are different. When it first happened, it was kinda weird briefing a BFM flight in Key West (while guest instructing a -106 event), and when we got to "currency", I met the sortie requirements (based on recent Growler flying) so was thus "current"/legal, but I hadn't flown an E/F in something going on 2 years
AircraftGeek513
Active Member
Makes since I guess with 80something percent systems in common.Yes, that happened around 3 years ago. It is the same "qual" now, annually. There are some annotated "EF" or "G" differences, where a procedure only applies to one and not the other, and the bingo tables are different. When it first happened, it was kinda weird briefing a BFM flight in Key West (while guest instructing a -106 event), and when we got to "currency", I met the sortie requirements (based on recent Growler flying) so was thus "current"/legal, but I hadn't flown an E/F in something going on 2 years
Begs the question… given a slick F or G, with the obvious exception of no gun or 9X, do you fight them any different during BFM? Also, did they ever get around to getting 9X approved? I heard the Red Sea AOR might have been a forcing function on that.Yes, that happened around 3 years ago. It is the same "qual" now, annually. There are some annotated "EF" or "G" differences, where a procedure only applies to one and not the other, and the bingo tables are different. When it first happened, it was kinda weird briefing a BFM flight in Key West (while guest instructing a -106 event), and when we got to "currency", I met the sortie requirements (based on recent Growler flying) so was thus "current"/legal, but I hadn't flown an E/F in something going on 2 years
Only difference is really the tactical systems, and NATOPS doesn't deal with tactics or weapons. So there ya go
No not really. I might be less lazy now without JHMCS and 9X, but no, the thing fights the same as an F in the configurations we fly BFM in. Last I heard, RAAF is cleared and NAWDC is cleared. Still standing by to probably stand up the first AIM-9 lecture for VAQ......theres basically the 3 of us in the SAU who have prior experience in Whidbey, though to be fair, the skipper was formerly the AIM-9/Gun SME at SFWSL like 10+ years ago, so maybe it'd be him. I was just the dirty HARM/AARGM/Standoff SME at my schoolhouse.......shhhhhh, don't tell them I know how to MN FILE
Attachments
I hear these guys offer a guarantee.
Airline Training Programs™ / ATP Flight School
ATP's Airline Career Pilot Program takes you from zero time to commercial airline pilot in two and a half years.
atpflightschool.com
Thought we were able to ask stupid questions in this forum
You are, but expect a few stupid answers.
Probably would. But jet time is virtually jet PIC your whole career. Definitely not true for the P-8 community. If going back to be an instructor you can rack up a ton of hours either way.
Noted. Thanks.😂