Negative.One more question: has anyone here on the civilian side done an interview?
Don't know if it's different for prior service, in-service, and civilians though. Would be curious to see if other people here have any different experience.
Negative.One more question: has anyone here on the civilian side done an interview?
A bit out of date but 9 years ago it was 55: https://www.airwarriors.com/community/threads/what-nrc-considers-competitive.41212/post-760891Thanks. Did a bit of digging and found a high OAR score for SWO to be above 50.
Would you please share the magic 'high OAR' for intel @FormerRecruitingGuru ?
Thanks. Did a bit of digging and found a high OAR score for SWO to be above 50.
Would you please share the magic 'high OAR' for intel @FormerRecruitingGuru ?
50+ though 60+ I would say is a competitive OAR score.
One more question: has anyone here on the civilian side done an interview? I have seen a lot of older posts (>10 years mostly) talking about tracking down Intel Os for interviews, but my recruiter didn't even mention that as a possibility to me and I haven't seen anything about it recently or in the program authorizations. Is that still an option if you are looking to burnish a packet?
EDIT: distinct from LORs
Don't mean to pile on @FormerRecruitingGuru but would you please opine whether, for anyone with an OAR below 60, other factors (GPA, Recommendations etcetera) have to be strong, to outweigh the (little below) average OAR, for a competitive package?
In most cases OAR will track with GPA, so a person with a high GPA will tend to have a high OAR and low GPA a low OAR, a high OAR won't make up for a low GPA, but a high GPA will definitely over ride a low OAR, that is why I say don't worry about OAR.Thanks. Did a bit of digging and found a high OAR score for SWO to be above 50.
Would you please share the magic 'high OAR' for intel @FormerRecruitingGuru ?
It is just the average, there will some higher and some lower. The higher from 3.5 probably the better off you are, the lower from 3.5 would be the opposite.Is a 3.5 roughly what gets people picked up, or is it more of a bare minimum? The program authorization says 3.0 is the threshold but everything I've seen here seems to indicate that a GPA that low is a nonstarter. However I have seem some contradictory posts about whether a 3.5 would be "great" or just adequate.
Also, do they look at the competitiveness of the school? As in, would a 3.5 from Harvard be treated the same as a 3.5 from any other school?
Thank you for clarifying! And Happy New Year to everyoneIt is just the average, there will some higher and some lower. The higher from 3.5 probably the better off you are, the lower from 3.5 would be the opposite.
Sorry to bother again, but is it at least a possibility? Really what I am wondering is, if I were to start running around trying to line up an interview with a current Intel O, it would come off as "wow he's really motivated and wants this" or "wow he's a moron"It's not a requirement
Unless you have know the person for a significant amount of time and they have seen you perform it won't mean anything, almost anyone can make a good impression for 30 minutes, and the board members know this.Sorry to bother again, but is it at least a possibility? Really what I am wondering is, if I were to start running around trying to line up an interview with a current Intel O, it would come off as "wow he's really motivated and wants this" or "wow he's a moron"
I did this, but I was an active Marine and wanted it just in case. My CO and peers had close contacts at the academy and were able to vouch for me and get interviews set up. None of the civilian selects from my board did it. Like ExnavyOffRec said, it's worthless for most people.Sorry to bother again, but is it at least a possibility? Really what I am wondering is, if I were to start running around trying to line up an interview with a current Intel O, it would come off as "wow he's really motivated and wants this" or "wow he's a moron"