That's hard to say because it's not really as clear what a perfect/amazing/great/good/ok/eh/bad/really bad score is on the OAR as it is on the SAT. The OAR is out of 80, but it seems like very few people get above 70, which is why people see scores in the 60s as pretty good, and 50s as good, too. But no one really knows, because the Navy doesn't publish the average OAR score of candidates selected by each community. On the other hand, all colleges compile their average admitted SAT score range and publish them in the US News report.
What I'm trying to say is that I got an SAT score (and to a slightly lesser extent, LSAT score) that is objectively almost perfect. It's clear that a 63 on the OAR isn't almost perfect, but what I gather from this site is that I shouldn't worry at all about my OAR score because it's as high as I need it to be for anything I'd apply to. So the answer to your question is either yes, mine were correlated (because they were both high enough that they can't be seen as negative by anyone) or they weren't correlated (because other tests were almost perfect but OAR was not).
Hell, maybe the difference is just that it's been a long time since I took a math class.
Understood, thanks for the advice! I'll keep the OAR scores in mind as I start studying and taking the practice tests.