Forgive my slowness but over the past few days I've been asking myself what is the point of this debate. I see a group of people that think we should call "a spade a spade" and another group wanting to reserve conclusions for more information. I can see the merits of both but what's the real argument? In a few weeks or months we'll know everything we'd ever want to know about this guy and the former group on here can pontentially point and laugh at the later. But are we really debating the polital/judicial system in place or are we just trying to one up the other guys on here? I honestly can't tell anymore.