D
Deleted member 67144 scul
Guest
The next board will convene by the time you guys get the results.
Honestly this is one of the programs (OCS) that puts out results the fastest... When you are an enlisted sailor you wait almost a year for E7 promotion results. So its not as bad as some of you may think. Things like this are no fast all bases must be covered and as far as being transparent welcome to the military/gov.I just wish they were more professional about the whole thing - not a good example of effective leadership.
Honestly this is one of the programs (OCS) that puts out results the fastest... When you are an enlisted sailor you wait almost a year for E7 promotion results. So its not as bad as some of you may think. Things like this are no fast all bases must be covered and as far as being transparent welcome to the military/gov.
SWO has certainly changed their method over the past couple years. The new 'hollistic' concept outlined in the N3 - Operations notice #39 has definetly thrown some people a curve-ball. I mean last board there was a 4.0 GPA/70 OAR candidate and a 3.7 GPA with a Masters in Neueoscience that got an "N" but "Y" from Intel. I spoke with a local SWO Lieutenant at the ROTC program at my school and he mentioned how they are hot and heavy on Prior service Navy guys, AD Navy and that the motivational statement with 'SWO-Centric' statements is heavily considered.I just wish they were more professional about the whole thing - not a good example of effective leadership.
They are also aware that the timeline impacts an individual's ability to fine-tune packages for upcoming boards, should it be necessary
I spoke with a local SWO Lieutenant at the ROTC program at my school and he mentioned how they are hot and heavy on Prior service Navy guys, AD Navy and that the motivational statement with 'SWO-Centric' statements is heavily considered.
SWO has certainly changed their method over the past couple years. The new 'hollistic' concept outlined in the N3 - Operations notice #39 has definetly thrown some people a curve-ball. I mean last board there was a 4.0 GPA/70 OAR candidate and a 3.7 GPA with a Masters in Neueoscience that got an "N" but "Y" from Intel. I spoke with a local SWO Lieutenant at the ROTC program at my school and he mentioned how they are hot and heavy on Prior service Navy guys, AD Navy and that the motivational statement with 'SWO-Centric' statements is heavily considered.
*edit: He also mentioned how those two collisions shook the SWO community quite a bit
Thanks for your thoughts Zoeth and Vincent. This is the whole: "What we have here is a failure to communicate." Let applicants know what is currently "hot" so they can tailor their packages accordingly, or pivot to what is more suitable.
Unfortunately, it's more than that. I am missing my first two looks (choosing orders for my next duty station) because I have a pending OCS package results from this board and the June 12th IWC board. My Detailers will not allow me to select or be selected for orders. My family is awaiting the results so we can decide financial decisions as well for investments and job opportunities.
Also unfortunately - they have 45 days to post it so we are coming close on the last week.
I feel like each community puts priority on different parts of your package. Like Intel wants that sky-high GPA, Crypto wants that STEM degree, NFO/SNA want that high ASTB score. Who the hell really knows what SWO wants right now.
Maybe the SWO board was notified of his pro rec Y from Intel. And decided to just look at other packages. I feel like Rufio has mentioned this phenomenon before.SWO has certainly changed their method over the past couple years. The new 'hollistic' concept outlined in the N3 - Operations notice #39 has definetly thrown some people a curve-ball. I mean last board there was a 4.0 GPA/70 OAR candidate and a 3.7 GPA with a Masters in Neueoscience that got an "N" but "Y" from Intel. I spoke with a local SWO Lieutenant at the ROTC program at my school and he mentioned how they are hot and heavy on Prior service Navy guys, AD Navy and that the motivational statement with 'SWO-Centric' statements is heavily considered.
*edit: He also mentioned how those two collisions shook the SWO community quite a bit
Wow that would be interesting. In the case of the girl with the 3.7 masters in nueroscience I know she put SWO #1, but maybe for the other guy this was the case. I wonder if that could account for some of the odd cases over the past ~yearMaybe the SWO board was notified of his pro rec Y from Intel. And decided to just look at other packages. I feel like Rufio has mentioned this phenomenon before.
Maybe the SWO board was notified of his pro rec Y from Intel. And decided to just look at other packages. I feel like Rufio has mentioned this phenomenon before.