20JUN2022 INTEL Board

[jmichaelscott]

Is anyone with access to the list able to tell me if I made it or not?

 

[Creeping_Geep]

IWC is made up of several designators Intel, IP, CW, Oceano and others.

The intel board has been convening separately from the rest of the IWC board for the last few cycles. Don't know why.

 

[OgeyRrats]

I am civilian as well but havent heard yet how did you find out?

Asked my recruiter to check after seeing the posts here

 

[exNavyOffRec]

The intel board has been convening separately from the rest of the IWC board for the last few cycles. Don't know why.

Yes, but he referred to IWC as if it was designator, that is why I clarified, it doesn't help that CW used to be IW

 

[OgeyRrats]

Is there any way to get feedback on nonselection?

According to my recruiter they are sending something called a Pro-No, which according to him is the reason, so either he’s wrong or you are lol

 

[FormerRecruitingGuru]

Is there any way to get feedback on nonselection?

No.

 

[exNavyOffRec]

Great time to drop this PA lol recruitment is hurting and people are retiring in large numbers

Recruiting is not hurting, it is tight for enlisted but officer side it is doing quite well.

They actually gave a good amount of warning on this one.

 

[exNavyOffRec]

Waiverable up to 12 years. Anything past that is unlikely. But can’t hurt to ask. Worse case they’ll say No if you’re over the 144 months or 12 year requirement as stated below.

What they will most likely do is if someone applies over 12 years is just auto reject, the way the PA is written it gives NRC the authority to stop the application there.

NRC could just rubber stamp the waiver so the board can reject, IWC put the 12 year cap for a reason so they will probably want to hold to it.

 

[Creeping_Geep]

Is there any way to get feedback on nonselection?

There is no formal feedback. Occasionally the IWC panels have included a reason an applicant was passed over in the board memo, but that is not usual and it is also only for things that made the candidate ineligible (e.g., OAR score, security clearance). The best you can do is ask yourself two questions: 1) was I marked "DNR" ("do not return"), and 2) if not, what is the weakest part of my application that I can still change?

 

[exNavyOffRec]

According to my recruiter they are sending something called a Pro-No, which according to him is the reason, so either he’s wrong or you are lol

That is literally a list of names that say "Pro N" nothing more, here is a redacted one.

 

[exNavyOffRec]

There is no formal feedback. Occasionally the IWC panels have included a reason an applicant was passed over in the board memo, but that is not usual and it is also only for things that made the candidate ineligible (e.g., OAR score, security clearance). The best you can do is ask yourself two questions: 1) was I marked "DNR" ("do not return"), and 2) if not, what is the weakest part of my application that I can still change?

Unfortunately the common things that will cause a "No" often cannot easily be changed (GPA and degree).

 

[Gks2027]

That is literally a list of names that say "Pro N" nothing more, here is a redacted one.
View attachment 35988

Has this been released for the most recent board?

 

[exNavyOffRec]

Has this been released for the most recent board?

Your recruiter would have it.

 

[exNavyOffRec]

I’m active duty.

In that case it would only be your CoC or on BOL

 

[Creeping_Geep]

Has this been released for the most recent board?

It's "released" in that it is on NRC's internal website, which not everyone with a CAC has access to.