disgruntledchrome
Member
There are actually more enlisted applicants for INTEL than CW, though.
Do you have a list?There are actually more enlisted applicants for INTEL than CW, though.
sharepointDo you have a list?
Oh rip i don't have access im a civiliansharepoint
Are u counting like second pick tho? Cuz like realistically it should only be 1st picks considering ur only evaluated for 1st pick.Yeah. It took me over 3-4 months to get my account approved. There are 123 people at board for INTEL alone with CW having roughly the same if not more so people either are waiting for accounts or arent aware this forum exists.
Good point, but I wonder if they are going to do 1st and 2nd picks in the same board.Are u counting like second pick tho? Cuz like realistically it should only be 1st picks considering ur only evaluated for 1st pick.
It only had my name on there for my first pick.Are u counting like second pick tho? Cuz like realistically it should only be 1st picks considering ur only evaluated for 1st pick.
Someone said it earlier and my recruiter did confirm that it’s been a year now that they only consider first pick. So what I’d like to know is, is it 123 Intel for example across both picks or just 1st? Because if it’s both then u could probably cut that number in half since most have 2 picks.Good point, but I wonder if they are going to do 1st and 2nd picks in the same board.
Well, I can assure you that there are no duplicate names under different designators, but I also could be mistaken due to me not having access to the other systems recruiters have. SoSomeone said it earlier and my recruiter did confirm that it’s been a year now that they only consider first pick. So what I’d like to know is, is it 123 Intel for example across both picks or just 1st? Because if it’s both then u could probably cut that number in half since most have 2 picks.
I’m a civilian at the end of the day so it’s all speculation on my end. I guess the applicants don’t matter if we get a large amount of seats availableWell, I can assure you that there are no duplicate names under different designators, but I also could be mistaken due to me not having access to the other systems recruiters have. So![]()