As of last week the CO of MATSG has said that this NSS hike for API attrition is not applicable to Marines.
except that this is the Navy and PRT's are the devil Bobby Boucher
View attachment 11506
Rumor has it that YG04 is now undermanned for 1310s because the pendulum swung too far... (For those that weren't there, they also separated most attrites and DORs.)This all happened before in 2005 to the FY '04 SNAs.
My question is:
how does having a minimum score NOW change what you WOULD have done? There was a time you WOULDN'T have put in 100% effort? There was a time you WOULDN'T have tried to max the PRT? Prior to this you WOULDN'T have gone after 100's on all the written exams? All of a sudden because you HAVE to have a 43 NSS you're going to try harder? What sort of attitude is that?
43, 55, 70, whatever...The MINIMUM should not have a bearing on giving your maximum.
Rumor has it that YG04 is now undermanned for 1310s because the pendulum swung too far... (For those that weren't there, they also separated most attrites and DORs.)
There has to be a better way. Like putting people in the reserves until they're needed. Why would you can someone who is mentally, morally and physically qualified? It'll save you lots of time and money to furlough guys, and push them a year group. Especially if you paid for their education. And someone with a 94 average (or whatever the moving target is) is someone who clearly demonstrates that they have what it takes.
The more I type, the hinkier the premise sounds, but I'm sure there's a higher purpose that hasn't been revealed.
Yup, by making it an NSS minimum instead of simply a 90 or whatever required on the tests, it kind of creates a self-raising bar If the first few classes meet the bar, the bar raises. If those classes meet the bar, it raises again. I shall henceforth refer to it as the reverse limbo.
Good luck, don't freak out, just study hard and hit the gym.
Maybe it's time to sign up for Vance so I won't be at the end of it. :-(
....or maybe not.