Been stalking these forums for a long time, happy to say I'm finally checking in for this board!
NFO Only
Age: 21
ASTB: Taking in December
GPA: 2.9 B.A. in Chemistry (graduating in May)
He's probably trying to really emphasize the hurry of hurry up and wait.Why are you waiting to long to take the ASTB?
Why are you waiting to long to take the ASTB?
I'd like a little bit more time to study up; been tough with all my other classes this semester. I asked my recruiter and they don't have a problem with it. I hindsight I should've taken it earlier in the semester, but I may try to squeeze it in later in November if I feel confident enough.
Have to apply SNA/NFO with new changes recruiter informed me, no interest in NFO
Apparently if you qualify for both SNA and NFO and don't apply for both it severely hurts your chances of getting SNA.Wait, so you had to apply for both? Last I heard you could choose which you applied for.
Apparently if you qualify for both SNA and NFO and don't apply for both it severely hurts your chances of getting SNA.Wait, so you had to apply for both? Last I heard you could choose which you applied for.
Apparently if you qualify for both SNA and NFO and don't apply for both it severely hurts your chances of getting SNA.
I would trust Rufio more. I have just heard that from many places. I guess the rationale is while there is also a lack of aviators, there's an even bigger gap with the number of FOs. Even further,Is this true? This seems counter-intuitive. Applicants who scored high on one section likely scored similarly on another. Because I scored high on the PFAR, I would feel more secure in applying for SNA only, despite also scoring high on the FOFAR. It doesn't change my mind about what I'm applying for, it just doesn't make sense to me. Why would i have a decreased likelihood of acceptance with multiple high scores because I'm applying for only one position as opposed to someone else with a lower score on one section applying for only one position?