Despite the double article...I knew you'd say this someday. HAHA
That is what getting up at O-dark-thirty will do to you. After the latest gay thread I guess I had balls on my mind........
Despite the double article...I knew you'd say this someday. HAHA
Well, come on. It's not like Obama was invited and laughed derisively while balling up the invitation and shooting a three-pointer into the trash can. "Medal of Honor! Fvck that! I'm going to hang with my liberal Hollywood friends!"
I think this was mostly a staffie fvck-up. You know most of the time politicians are in "where are we going next, staff schedules guy?" mode, especially on an insanely busy day like Inauguration Day.
Politically, I'm not with the President. But I think now is the opportunity for we conservatives to be more grown-up about a President who is not of our party than those of the left were for the last eight years. In other words, cut the guy some slack.
none of this matters -- we made history!!!!! Yes we did!!!!!
P.S. Be respectful, I have seen a few posts here lately (not necessarily on this thread) that tread into Article 88 territory.
True. Until I hear otherwise, I'm assuming he didn't go to display his hatred toward the men and women who wear the uniform.:icon_winkHe's the president...he could have gone if he wanted to. He could have prioritized and made it happen.
Everyone else will be getting the commemorative bobble-heads--I hear they will be worth quite a lot one day--The illegal ones right?
And the tone of that article is hardly indicative of objectivity.
It is only commensurate with all the positive hype for having, accomplished nothing, made no hard decisions or even broken a sweat. When he makes a really tough call I'll give him a break, something the left rarely afforded Bush.Is this forum going to turn into a dumping ground for Fox News's whining, err I mean... talking points re: President Obama?
There have been about 4-5 threads created in the past few days to bash on Obama, and he's barely been in office a week.
As to the link, it was an editorial. That is why it may have sounded, appropriately so, snarky. You can be excused for the confusion since you are so used to slip shod yellow journalism found in the news pages it looked like straight news to you. Back in the day there was no confusing straight news stories and opinion.
P.S. Be respectful, I have seen a few posts here lately (not necessarily on this thread) that tread into Article 88 territory.
The man hasn't even been in office a week and Congress is on vacation. What do you expect him to accomplish in this time? Do you have even higher expectations of him than the left, who make him out to be the messiah and savior of America? Did you actually believe his whole "change" campaign slogan? I don't think the CiC deserves to be bashed until proven otherwise.It is only commensurate with all the positive hype for having, accomplished nothing, made no hard decisions or even broken a sweat. When he makes a really tough call I'll give him a break, something the left rarely afforded Bush.