Not really CAS. And the resolution calls for more than a no-fly zone - "all necessary measures...to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas" is the phraseology.
OK, who IDs targets and calls strikes.
Not really CAS. And the resolution calls for more than a no-fly zone - "all necessary measures...to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas" is the phraseology.
OK, who IDs targets and calls strikes.
As someone who teaches FAC/JTACs the intricacies of CAS for a living - a no-fly zone is more similar to SCAR than CAS.OK, who IDs targets and calls strikes.
The definition of CAS from Joint Pub 3-09.3: "Close air support (CAS) is air action by fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft against hostile targets that are in close proximity to friendly forces, and requires detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of those forces."
Further: "Close air support (CAS) can be conducted at any place and time friendly forces are in close proximity to enemy forces. The word “close” does not imply a specific distance; rather, it is situational. The requirement for detailed integration because of proximity, fires, or movement is the determining factor."
WAIT!!!!
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2011/03/navy-libya-possible-no-fly-zone-role-031311w/
I'm afraid that unless Ghadafi does something REALLY bad, like make not-so-humorous videos with a little off-color content, the Navy has more important stuff to worry about.