They took you!
You're not in CODs yet Bates. And besides, I was an engineering major out of Illinois!
They took you!
Maybe we SHOULD have an understanding of an airfoil. I mean if you can't handle a little simple physics/engineering, then maybe you're not ideal.Why do you think that a technical major is the strongest sought by the Navy?
Granted, the Navy is pretty hard up and will accept almost anyone to be an aviator or NFO.
Maybe we SHOULD have an understanding of an airfoil. I mean if you can't handle a little simple physics/engineering, then maybe you're not ideal.Why do you think that a technical major is the strongest sought by the Navy?
Granted, the Navy is pretty hard up and will accept almost anyone to be an aviator or NFO.
Then this:One thing I do know, never piss off an engineer.
![]()
I couldn't agree more.For what its worth...(not much I know), I have had zero use for any aerodynamic knowledge since leaving API. Is it helpful to know that increasing AOA at a given airspeed increases lift? Sure. Will you also figure that out with a business degree? Absolutely.
As far as why the Navy prefers technical majors...I would suggest two things. The first being tradition. It has always been so, and most Navy jobs are somewhat technical...so...
Second, the ability to complete a technical major shows an ability to organize, use and regurgitate material that you are recently aquaited with that completion of a non-technical major may not neccesarily demonstrate. Just as a 1400 on the SAT's doesn't guarantee that you will succeed in college, a technical major isn't a guarantee that you will suceed in Naval Aviation...it does however tell whomever something about the way your head works.
BTW...as a non-technical major and at the time, not a college grad...I would go toe to toe with the JO's on my boat about plant engineering and routinely come away ahead...the degree doesn't make the man.
If you go VFA...you'll study energy addition/loss curves and radius/rates for specific platforms and apply that in real world flights.
You will not do caluclus.
I was about to say, there is a need/use for some aerodynamics as you go along. Understanding the power curve can be helpful as well. But that doesn't go against what Brett said. Most, if not all you need to know you get in API (and later HTs if you go that route).
Yeah, it doesn't take a genius to figure out E&M diagrams or other performance related things. It takes an engineer to create these tools, not to employ them.
Brett
Agreed, but the "I Believe" button is for pussies.