I think the scariest piece of bad SWO gouge floating around today is,"don't worry, they WILL qualify you."
Haven't been on AW in a couple of years given time demands at sea.
I agree, tiz84, this is bad gouge.
Here are a couple of thoughts from a SWO CO's perspective:
1) CO should be actively involved in mentoring JOs and if they aren't they are doing something wrong.
2) It's very easy to learn the strengths and weaknesses of the Officers in a small (25-35) wardroom.
3) A SWO board is important for the Officer, but an OOD board/qual is critical for the safety of the ship and crew. I can overlook a lot of boardisms at a SWO board - not so much at an OOD board.
4) The CICWO and OOD qual are about knowing and operating the ship.
5) The SWO qual is about how the ship fits into the larger battle group and fleet operations as well as bigger Navy items.
6) I get the most frustrated and disappointed at boards when an Officer fails to retain information from past qualifications. SWO boards should not be stump-the-chump, but I expect core questions from previous boards and quals to be "softballs" at a SWO board. If the knowledge isn't retained, my first rhetorical question to the Officer and myself is, "Why the hell am I allowing you to stand this particular watch!"
Sent from Samsung Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2