staff said:Well thanks for the info guys. I know I'm looking way into the future seeing how I am only 20, but I guess it doesn't hurt to get some good advice. Hopefully one of these days I'll be on that Mars mission, but I have a long way to go. Thanks.
Yepper...she was a Nav/Comm in my squadron. She was a good FO. Still waiting for her ride I think, but I know she's been the "voice of CAPCOM" on a couple of occasions if memory serves right.HAL Pilot said:I did hear of a reserve female LCDR NFO in the NAS Jax reserve P-3 squadron who was a Mission Specialist but she got in through NASA's civilian selection process.
AllAmerican75 said:What about NASA test pilots? Are they all civilians, or are they liasoned Navy, USMC, and USAF pilots and FO's? How do you apply?
They are assigned as astronauts. Or did you mean active duty test pilots assigned as test pilots only?phrogdriver said:I know that at least some of them are civilian, and I'm tempted to say that all of them are, simply because I've never heard of an active-duty test pilot being assigned to NASA.
What do you mean when you say that the AF is bigger on "promoting" advanced degrees for its officers? May be a dumb question sorry, I just didn't understand it.phrogdriver said:I know that at least some of them are civilian, and I'm tempted to say that all of them are, simply because I've never heard of an active-duty test pilot being assigned to NASA.
I wouldn't say that any service has an "edge" as far as astronaut selection. As far as shuttle pilot is concerned, they have to have a jet background as a prerequisite. The Air Force has a higher proportion of those, so that may be a factor if being an astronaut pilot is your goal.
As far as mission specialist, they want advanced degrees in the sciences. There are programs for those in the USN and USMC, and I know of at least one mission specialist from each (both CH-46 pilots, BTW). However, the USAF is way bigger on promoting advanced degrees for its officers, so on that basis I would speculate that they may have an edge there as well. Note that I'm not saying the service itself gives an edge, only that the USAF might give more opportunity for an applicant to get the prerequisites for selection.
staff said:What do you mean when you say that the AF is bigger on "promoting" advanced degrees for its officers? May be a dumb question sorry, I just didn't understand it.
phrogdriver said:By promoting, I meant that the USAF strongly encourages a master's in order to advance past major and provides opportunities to pursue one. The Navy is heading that way to some degree, but the Marine Corps (in spite of a strong PME committment) doesn't care too much at all about degrees.
heyjoe said:Agree that USAF not only strongly encourages, but USAF types are desperate to get their Masters before O-4 because not having one is viewed as reason not to get promoted. They seem to me to have a culture of conformity and getting blocks checked thoroughout their careers...need service schools and certain number of hours by certain gates. Agree that Navy and Marines don't have that level of pressure. Sustained performance seems to kep you competitive in the Sea Services.