kwarner04 said:
Any ideas on why the NFO rate is higher than the NA rate? I figured it'd be the other way around, but then again, what do I know? I'm still in college.
A few contributing factors (again, just guesses, but logical..)
1- NFOs have fewer VTs, fewer studs. So even a slight, insignificant variation gets exaggerated in the overall attrition rate.
2- Some of it's mental. A lot of pilots get over airsickness when they're flying the plane... you don't have that to fall back on. Shouldn't really be a problem, but some folks get that mental block.
Others just have an attitude problem-- wannabe pilots with a case of sour grapes who never try. Not a whole lot, but I knew one or two, and instructors smell that out.
3- The Air Force doesn't help
Again, just a guess... but the AF has the ridiculous idea of guaranteeing you jets vice panel nav before you've set foot in the plane. There's simply no option for an AF guy who struggles to say "Hey, maybe you should go RC-135s... B-1s/F-15s might be out of your league", which would save them from attrition. Marines have the same problem. If you can't hack TACAIR, you're gone. Period.