Sorry. I just didn't know where to find the half facetious emoji.OK, then. Not trying to start anything here. I still use "Wilco" too- just didn't see a reason to die on that particular hill.
Smilies, and shit.
WILCO, eh? Carry the fire brother!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry. I just didn't know where to find the half facetious emoji.OK, then. Not trying to start anything here. I still use "Wilco" too- just didn't see a reason to die on that particular hill.
Smilies, and shit.
Roger that.Good enough for the world! Hell, I still use WILCO.
I recall returning to my home in Kingsville only to find a very large, nasty arachnid attached to my front door and challenging my entry. Taratulas and javelina's were not uncommon sights in the neighborhood.And no nasty arachnids like Kingsville.
I’ve gotten into the habit of calling it a tarmac, but as you said it’s probably he result of lots of EUCOM flying. I’m with you though, I could never get circuit programmed into my head.Other countries use the term a lot- I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. The one I get tripped up by when I'm overseas is calling the "pattern" a "circuit". Also, slot times and asking permission to start. Ugh.
I still use "Wilco" too-
I still feel that way about "Line up and wait". It has been 3 or 4 years now,
Wait, What?? is WILCO not a thing anymore?
Most recent formal reference I have seen is the 2014 Pilot Controller Glossary. WILCO is listed. But I can say, having taught out of a few private pilot handbooks and texts, that it isn't commonly taught at the entry level. In 32 years flying the line I think I only heard a couple other airline guys use it on the radio. My pet peeve is saying ROGER improperly. It is too common for folks to use it in place of AFFIRMATIVE or for some form of agreement. Hate that!Wait, What?? is WILCO not a thing anymore?
It is too common for folks to use it in place of AFFIRMATIVE or for some form of agreement. Hate that!
Oh ok so I’ll just say Roger WILCO all the time instead. It’s my favorite.Most recent formal reference I have seen is the 2014 Pilot Controller Glossary. WILCO is listed. But I can say, having taught out of a few private pilot handbooks and texts, that it isn't commonly taught at the entry level. In 32 years flying the line I think I only heard a couple other airline guys use it on the radio. My pet peeve is saying ROGER improperly. It is too common for folks to use it in place of AFFIRMATIVE or for some form of agreement. Hate that!
??Oh ok so I’ll just say Roger WILCO all the time instead. It’s my favorite.
There is a Brickyard pilot that routinely flies into DCA who uses “You bet ‘cha.”
But "with the flash" when told to IDENT is still acceptable, right?Also something I am glad not to have to hear hardly at all any more, "Naw, got em on the fish finder though", when issued traffic by ATC. Absolutely worthless reply. ATC doesn't care about what is on the TCAS. They need you to see the traffic. Either you do or you don't.

There is no such word as "IDENTing" ?But "with the flash" when told to IDENT is still acceptable, right?
Honest questions though:
Are you required to respond to "radar contact 3 mi north of Podunk airport" with a "position checks" or something similar? I've gotten told that you don't need to and I've also gotten told you need to "roger up" to it.
Do you actually have to read back "IDENT?" Same thing as above. I've been told yes and I've been told no.