C-5 Down In Dover?

[Brett327]

For some reason, I missed this the first time around. Mules, I soft deleted the post w/ the link on it. PM on the way just to find out what someone else may have said. For now, this vid did make the rounds at work w/ a FOUO disclaimer, so let's not feed the fire until I can see what's going on.

Seems like if it is already in the public domain, there's not much harm in linking to it here. If it is FOUO, the cat's already out of the bag.

Brett

 

[HH-60H]

Your SSN that was posted on the Naval Safety Center server is FOUO. Since the cat's already out of the bag would you like to post it here?

 

[Gatordev]

Seems like if it is already in the public domain, there's not much harm in linking to it here. If it is FOUO, the cat's already out of the bag.

Brett

I can understand the argument, and I know this isn't state secrets, but HH's point is right on. Two wrongs don't make a right. I've got a call in to "the man," and since it is his is site (and ass), I'll wait 'til he responds.

 

[Brett327]

Your SSN that was posted on the Naval Safety Center server is FOUO. Since the cat's already out of the bag would you like to post it here?

It's a little different since the Safety Center error has presumably been corrected while the linked video is still available and circulating out on the internet.

@ Gator: Fair enough

Brett

 

[Gatordev]

Link and post removed by request.

 

[wink]

While FOUO may not be considered real "classification" one might recall that unauthorized publication/dissemination does not equate to declassification. We would not comment on an article in Aviation Week we know contains classified information. Nor would it be proper to further its circulation. I agree with the delete. Small point, maybe, but consistent all the same.