Schnugg said:testing my memory of course...on the fwd and aft...but I think I got it right...
:icon_lol:
Schnugg said:testing my memory of course...on the fwd and aft...but I think I got it right...
NavyVance said:If I was a jet guy, id want my NFO to be able to fly incase I took a bird in the face... Just me.
NavyVance said:With a pilot slumped over in the front.. I cant think of anything more pressing ;p.
Flash said:Ironically, there are controls in the backseat of the only USAF tactical jet with a NAV, the F-15E.
Venom-0 said:Don't know about them being able to land on the carrier; that being said, however, I did have alot of friends (during my time in the Navy) who had tons of flight time before joining the Navy as NFOs. I'm sure they won't have too hard of a time landing it on a decent sized runway....Heck, even an NFO with no flight time might be able to do ok given he knows the limitation of the aircraft and doesn't overspeed the flaps or gear and doesn't stall that B****.
Fly Navy said:As far as I know, the only jet an NFO can hope to fly is an S-3.
Thank you. I know this subject pops up from time to time, so let me make it perfectly clear to everyone:Thisguy said:Yep, and that opportunity is gone for new FOs. Would the NFO ever get a chance to recover on the carrier? No. Would the NFO get some stick time so the pilot could walk to the back of the jet and take a piss in his piddle pack? Yes.
That's debatable.ip568 said:Boring but better than sleeping aft on the deck.
I thought that was an exception to the rule because there was a shortage of NAV's at some point, or something.Blutonski816 said:reasoning being that in those days, the Backseaters were Pilots and not NAVs...
Thisguy said:Would the NFO get some stick time so the pilot could walk to the back of the jet and take a piss in his piddle pack? Yes.