I agree with the above sentiments... There however is a fine line between teaching someone how to use the whiz bang tools that come in many airplanes these days, and allowing them to rely on them.
I think the truth is that most experienced aviators do 'rely' on all the high tech stuff to get the job done, but when shit hits the fan and all the MFDs and instrumentation bites the dust, the experienced aviator can calmly and confidently fall back on his skillset of dead reckoning, pilotage, or just common sense to get on deck.
If you take one of these rich yuppies that has 60 hrs total time of relying on his $400,000 avionics package with wings to get him on deck after the the lights go out, he'd probably get lost over the airfield he's trying to land at.
Back in college I back seated a solo checkride that left out of New Smyrna Beach. It was one of the all glass Cessna 172s. We went out to the area, executed the stall series, etc, and the instructor turned off the big ole mfds and placed a card over the VOR and said great, now take me home. Now, New Smyrna Beach, is oddly enough, ON THE COAST of Florida. The area we were operating in was South along the coast. All the student had to due, was look at the ocean, figure out figure out which way North was, point his titties in that direction and we would've gone straight home. Hell, he even had a 50/50 shot of which way North was. Even easier, he could've relied on the wet compass that the instructor WASNT covering up.
After about 10 miles of heading SOUTH and unfolding and refolding his sectional about 13 times, the instructor just said, "Yeah, we're going to have to try this checkride again".
I think that getting comfortable flying with no navigational instruments, just a chart, clock, and airspeed indicator builds a lot better SA habits. This student had 1,000 differnet things that would've clued him in to how to get home. The bezel on that mfd was the outer boundary of his SA bubble.