A noble tradition adrift.
bch said:
The point of Midshipman cruise (especially 1/C cruise) is to learn what being a Junior Officer in a community is all about. The boat/sqd/or sub does not need to be out at sea or on det for this to happen!
bch is undoubtedly correct. But from the sampling of experiences of Mids on 1/C cruise presented here, the ships and squadrons seem to be ambivalent at best toward the presence of the Mids.
My 3/C cruise was 6 weeks with only one week underway. Ironically, we visited a sleepy little West Coast beach town that sounded a lot like Belfast, Maine described in this string of testimonials. My 1/C cruise was also 6 weeks, all of it except one, terrific 4-day port visit, underway and in the combat zone (Gulf of Tonkin). The two cruises were indeed worlds apart. 3/C cruise was abysmal; in contrast 1/C cruise was almost as good as ..., well you know.
I hold the opinion that the best place for a Mid to learn what it's like to be a naval officer is to live in the naval officers environment, i.e., what today we call summer cruises. It is that noble tradition which stems back to the Royal Navy which embarked Mids as pre-teens who stayed on ships for years until they qualified to become Ensigns. (I'm not advocating anything like this. I'm just pointing it out that Mids living with Navy units and close to naval officers has been a proven path to becoming a junior officer.) But the other half of this concept is the "running mate" whereby the wardroom JOs take an active interest in orienting, at a detailed level, the Mid into what the DivOff does - at the deck plate level. I got this on my 1/C cruise. But from the comments of Mids here, the JOs were ambivalent at best and typically indifferent to the presence of the Mids.
If a Mid comes away from a summer cruise with a preference for earning money at a summer job and not being with the fleet after being encouraged to just sleep and goof off, how can they be blamed. "The Fleet" ostensibly took no interest in them. It was just either too busy or too self-absorbed to give them the sort of deck-level orientation and familiarization into what the DivOff is and does.
Looking at this situation at a higher level, I would presume that if 1/C Mids are returning to their units and not articulating their disatisfaction with their cruise experiences then nothing will change. If a significant number are reporting disatisfaction and some sort of trend is detected, then maybe, just maybe, NROTC Unit COs might register the sum of this dissatisfaction with CNET. I say maybe because unless the level of dissatisfaction is significant, nothing will change.
I hold the view that while Ensigns are still learning they should report aboard their first ship with a lot more knowledge than how to sleep and watch TV. Frankly, if Mid cruises are, more often than not, like the ones described here, then why bother having them and why bother having an NROTC Program.