Go to bed dude. You aren’t going to convince anyone here that a shitter pilot isn’t retarded.Are you like the Noble prize for grammer commisar?
Go back to the hanger wear you came from.
Go to bed dude. You aren’t going to convince anyone here that a shitter pilot isn’t retarded.Are you like the Noble prize for grammer commisar?
Go back to the hanger wear you came from.
Go to bed dude. You aren’t going to convince anyone here that a shitter pilot isn’t retarded.
Go to bed dude. You aren’t going to convince anyone here that a shitter pilot isn’t retarded.
So the goal was to not overwhelm the ERs and the ICUs...
Mayo Clinic to furlough or reduce pay of 30,000 employees
Mayo Clinic is furloughing or reducing the hours of about 42 percent of its 70,000 employees across all of its campuses in an attempt to mitigate the financial losses fromwww.postbulletin.com
If you keep reading on in the article it talks about how hospitals failing and having to shut down is a possible outcome of this. Despite what you’re seeing on the news, what happened in NYC isn’t happening many other places in the country.Not sure what you're getting at here, elective surgeries have been non existent the past month. Where is the surprise? How many ICUs does the Mayo Clinic run?
It isn't hard. If a hospital is losing money and is reducing capacity, then it can't have been overwhelmed by COVID patients. That was a fear. Predicted to happen and it didn't. So that goal of mitigation has worked. We now know we have excess capacity for a second wave or surge whether from relaxing mitigation or other reasons.Not sure what you're getting at here, elective surgeries have been non existent the past month. Where is the surprise? How many ICUs does the Mayo Clinic run?
and treatment is better today than it was 1-2 months ago.It isn't hard. If a hospital is losing money and is reducing capacity, then it can't have been overwhelmed by COVID patients. That was a fear. Predicted to happen and it didn't. So that goal of mitigation has worked. We now know we have excess capacity for a second wave or surge whether from relaxing mitigation or other reasons.
It wasn’t fear. It was preparation. And in some states like New York, Connecticut, Michigan, it was necessary.It isn't hard. If a hospital is losing money and is reducing capacity, then it can't have been overwhelmed by COVID patients. That was a fear. Predicted to happen and it didn't. So that goal of mitigation has worked. We now know we have excess capacity for a second wave or surge whether from relaxing mitigation or other reasons.
and treatment is better today than it was 1-2 months ago.
We don't have to be as aggressive with our collective methods of flattening the curve for two reasons- we know how high is "too high" for the curve, i.e. we have more accurate modeling to predict how much health care capacity we'll need, and that supposed maximum height of the curve is higher than it was a couple months ago, that is to say we have better treatment methods.
There's still a lot to learn but the overall picture is nowhere near as unclear nor as bleak as it was in mid-March.
Not sure what you're getting at here, elective surgeries have been non existent the past month. Where is the surprise? How many ICUs does the Mayo Clinic run?
If you keep reading on in the article it talks about how hospitals failing and having to shut down is a possible outcome of this. Despite what you’re seeing on the news, what happened in NYC isn’t happening many other places in the country.
“Hospitals across the country have deferred or canceled non-urgent surgeries to free up bed space and equipment for covid-19 patients. But that triage maneuver cut off a main source of income, causing huge losses that have forced some hospitals to let go of health-care workers as they struggle to treat infected patients."
Starved for cash, hospitals and doctor groups cut staff amid pandemic
Hospitals across the country have deferred or canceled non-urgent surgeries to free up bed space and equipment for covid-19 patients. But that triage maneuver cut off a main source of income, causing huge losses that have forced some hospitals to let go of health care workers as they are...www.stripes.com
A successful response to a pandemic is indistinguishable from an overreaction. Hard to walk that line. NYC shows us what happens when you under-react.Hopefully health officials have learned from this and won’t overreact with the next round of flu. New York City is not the entire country.
Yet... The sun rises and sets everyday... We can’t live in a bubble. Pauly Shore already tried that. ?A successful response to a pandemic is indistinguishable from an overreaction. Hard to walk that line. NYC shows us what happens when you under-react.
The testing shitshow unfortunately had us flying blind into this storm. Still does.
Here's the thing...this isn't The Big One. That one is coming someday, inevitably. As contagious as COVID and more deadly. If our medical response depends on hospitals who depend on streams of colonoscopies, dialyses, and tummy tucks to stay in business, we are going to be even more skuh-rewed. If access to pandemic treatment depends on your health insurance attained through the job you just got laid off from, we are going to be even more skuh-rewed.
Viruses mutate. This could turn into that. Hopefully COVID19 won't.
A successful response to a pandemic is indistinguishable from an overreaction. Hard to walk that line. NYC shows us what happens when you under-react.
The testing shitshow unfortunately had us flying blind into this storm. Still does.
Here's the thing...this isn't The Big One. That one is coming someday, inevitably. As contagious as COVID and more deadly. If our medical response depends on hospitals who depend on streams of colonoscopies, dialyses, and tummy tucks to stay in business, we are going to be even more skuh-rewed. If access to pandemic treatment depends on your health insurance attained through the job you just got laid off from, we are going to be even more skuh-rewed.
Viruses mutate. This could turn into that. Hopefully COVID19 won't.
No one really prepares for any eventuality unless the outcome without prep is undesirable. In the case of this virus, FEAR drove everything. Fear of a million deaths, fear of overwhelming hospitals, fear of infecting care givers. You can't have watched the news or heard a single briefing without knowing this. Proper preparation can reduce fear of outcome. But the desire to avoid the undesirable outcome drives the prep. And in this case it most certainly was accompanied by fear.It wasn’t fear. It was preparation. And in some states like New York, Connecticut, Michigan, it was necessary.
I get your point. In terms of pure results on the pandemic front, you are right. But an overreaction includes the excessive expenditures of resources and opportunity loss costs. Measurement of those at this time is difficult. But they can be measured in time and the delta between the minimum required for success and the cost of overreaction is a waste and harmful, even to the pandemic effort. I suppose the analogy would be logistics in war time. Huge amounts of waste, often for reasonable contingencies, many times not. But that waste redirects resources that could be used elsewhere.A successful response to a pandemic is indistinguishable from an overreaction. Hard to walk that line. NYC shows us what happens when you under-react.