Goodfou
Well-Known Member
The public won't support it, but the military shouldn't concern itself with that, IMO. That's an issue for the politicians.
As for the now ex-CO, I applaud him for sending the letter and for the letter being leaked (many are not convinced that Big Navy/DOD would have moved as quickly as they did otherwise, though if I suggested that plans were not being made I would be disingenuous and, indeed, the Acting SECNAV says that plans to evacuate most of the Sailors off of the ship were already being worked on before the letter was sent), but I also support the Navy's decision here. The CO took actions that he took because he truly cared for his Sailors, but its tough to support someone serving in a senior military leadership position who goes outside his CoC; that could be dangerous. Per the Acting SECNAV, the CSG Commander wasn't even aware of the letter until it was sent and the CAPT acted as he did despite the Acting SECNAV's COS telling the CAPT that he had a direct line to the SECNAV. And the letter was sent over unclassified channels and to people outside of the CoC at that. This tells me that the CAPT wanted the letter to be leaked.
Btw, I just listened to the Acting SECNAV's address on the matter. I thought it to be spot on. He expressly made clear that the CAPT was "absolutely correct in raising" the concerns that he did. Its how he did what he did that was the problem.
Serious question. What is “unsecured”? NMCI? Whatever equivalent network used on CVNs? Why would that be “unsecured”? The letter was not giving away anything that wasn’t already in the news so why would it have to be sent on the high side? Furthermore, those that were cc’d were likely the triads and DHs on his ship keeping them in the loop of his actions to try to take care of their Sailors... just my noob thoughts...
the actual letter: