Captain Crozier was the epitome of an over-reaction in the worst kind of way. Still believe it was right to fire him. Looking back a year later only reinforces my viewpoint…
Just wondering but were you there during the initial outbreak?Captain Crozier was the epitome of an over-reaction in the worst kind of way. Still believe it was right to fire him. Looking back a year later only reinforces my viewpoint…
Nope, I was in Sicily at the time. We didn’t miss any Ops for COVID because we took a calm, and science-based, approach to our adjustment to life. Two extra months of deployment and a lot of food deliveries by my Sailors for the incoming squadron as the ROM’ed through the RIP.Just wondering but were you there during the initial outbreak?
I have said this before, but you have to look through the lens of what he thought and said based on what was known at the time, which was virtually nothing. The science, as it was known then (Talking March of last year), said that 0.2% of healthy people in the 18-35 range would die from the disease. Out of 5000 people that would be 10 deaths. Assuming that folks on Navy deployment were probably the best people to get it the number was cut in half, which still means that 5 people were gong to die. Couple that with a complete inability to socially distance or quarantine people and the rate at which folks would catch this thing and potentially need ICU beds which vastly outnumbered the capability not just on board, but what existed in Guam. Also the transmission numbers were backed up by a Navy study on COVID-19 onboard a deployed ship and bounced off the Diamond Princess study as well. Even though the population onboard was drastically different, it was about the speed of transmission outpacing the ability to treat potentially life threatening conditions more than the final outcome.
Again, you have to look at the choices made at that time through the lens of what we knew at that time. I am positive that the response would have been drastically different knowing what we know now, but that was simply not the case then.
I still think I could write an entire book on what happened from my perspective, maybe one day I will....
Pickle - respect your opinion and comments. A year later, i'm convinced the CSG, 7th Fleet, PACFLT, and PACOM Commanders should have shouldered a LOT more of the responsibility. Capt Crozier was an easy target, and I get he was in charge on CVN-71, but his leadership did him NO favors . . . .Captain Crozier was the epitome of an over-reaction in the worst kind of way. Still believe it was right to fire him. Looking back a year later only reinforces my viewpoint…
No, the important part is preventing hospitalization or death. Raw case count is being used as a leading predictor of pending hospital loading and mortality.... Which gets divided by 10-25 if everyone is vaccinated.If we're talking about a mandate for civilians, the important part is how long it reduces the risk of transmission. That's the whole argument for the mandate. And it only slows transmission for 3-6 months.
AgreedPickle - respect your opinion and comments. A year later, i'm convinced the CSG, 7th Fleet, PACFLT, and PACOM Commanders should have shouldered a LOT more of the responsibility. Capt Crozier was an easy target, and I get he was in charge on CVN-71, but his leadership did him NO favors . . . .
Your rationalization for the mandate may be different than Biden's, and that's fine, but since he's the one issuing the mandate, your opinion on what's important is irrelevant. Biden stated the mandate was because it reduces transmission, so that is what is important to the government.No, the important part is preventing hospitalization or death. Raw case count is being used as a leading predictor of pending hospital loading and mortality.... Which gets divided by 10-25 if everyone is vaccinated.
Pickle - respect your opinion and comments. A year later, i'm convinced the CSG, 7th Fleet, PACFLT, and PACOM Commanders should have shouldered a LOT more of the responsibility. Capt Crozier was an easy target, and I get he was in charge on CVN-71, but his leadership did him NO favors . . . .
This times 100.Pickle - respect your opinion and comments. A year later, i'm convinced the CSG, 7th Fleet, PACFLT, and PACOM Commanders should have shouldered a LOT more of the responsibility. Capt Crozier was an easy target, and I get he was in charge on CVN-71, but his leadership did him NO favors . . . .