I don't really care if you come on here and chuck spears at me for sharing information, opinions, and ideas.It's interesting to see your critiques of the 'media' on here. And yet you share hot takes from an SEC football blogger trying to get paid with clicks.
Read this article from a former Republican operative on Travis:
However, here's my request for you Devil Dog. Find me YOUR own hot takes about the growing unemployment in the United States and it's impact on the economy, not to mention the 22 million people who are newly unemployed. 1 of 7 American workers are out of a job. You're kidding yourself if you think it's going stop there. And I've been reading Clay Travis' stuff since 2012. I don't always agree with what he's says, but it's interesting to get his takes. Above all, he will say that he's a First Amendment absolutist, meaning he's all about the free exchange of ideas and doesn't believe in censorship based on what the woke mafia says is okay.
I'd be remiss if I didn't give you the chance to read his rebuttal. Straight from the devil's mouth himself. Be careful clicking on it though. You'll just be putting more money in his pocket. (Again, I already visit his website. He doesn't get any 'clicks' of off someone viewing his Twitter feed). BTW, you should really get Twitter. You'll find a lot of your coronabros on there to commiserate with about us evil MAGA conspiracy theorists.
The Seven Deadly Sins of the Coronavirus
Recent data -- eight straight days of declining new daily infections -- and a recent decline in deaths, we hit a six day low yesterday, accompanied by a prolonged weekly plateau in deaths as well, suggest we have reached the peak of the coronavirus outbreak in this country. The story of...
www.outkickthecoverage.com
If you don't want to click, here's a sample of a different article he wrote:
"The only thing I’d change about my coverage of the coronavirus is I wish I’d been aware that China’s numbers were faked. You can certainly criticize me for not being skeptical enough of those China numbers, but I relied on the WHO endorsement of those numbers. And I believe many people in government in the United States and Europe relied on these same projections as well.
The current IMHE model forecasts right at 60,000 deaths from the coronavirus. That forecast is probably too high, but even if it’s accurate it means the number of people who die from the coronavirus in this country is likely to be less than died from the flu two years ago. (Two years ago 80,000 people died of the flu in this country and most of us didn’t even notice.)
Now 60,000 people (or less) are going to die of the coronavirus and people have lost their minds.
Many people who believed millions of people would die are going to have to answer this question: were the models they shared inaccurate or has Donald Trump saved millions of lives?
I happen to believe the models were massively wrong and that Trump has also saved lots of lives by his response as well.
I am of the opinion that the White House coronavirus task force — and, yes, President Trump too — have actually done a pretty good job responding to this crisis and I think the reason that people have decided to make me a target is because I’ve never bought into the doom and gloom forecasts and because I’ve been complimentary of the White House’s response."
All That and a Bag of Mail
It's Friday, which means it's time for the mailbag to entertain you. So let's roll. Not surprisingly, most of the questions rolling in still deal with the coronavirus. So let's start there: First, the good news, we are now kicking the coronavirus's ass. We have had five straight days of...
www.outkickthecoverage.com
