Msams
New Member
Aloha all,
I would like to start out by thanking everyone on this forum for all of the information here. It is really a gold mine. It has helped me with study for the astb, understanding the process, and nearly everything else to do with gaining my commission.
Now to the situation.
I have a signed DD 368. It is in hand, it was a moment of bliss. However, I just received an email from my recruiter (who is the man) that the digital signature that the army uses are rubbish. I need an old fashioned ink and paper for the navy. NOW, that may not seem like a huge problem seeing as the Army has already said they don't mind if I leave. It just so happens that the policy (any unit can add to the regs) states that a general officer needs to sign on this form. Through the twists and turns of life it happened that a 2 star major general signed off on my form (digitally). It will be extremely hard to get this resigned by the deadline for my packet.
The question,
Is there a snowballs chance that he could be misinformed and we can use the 368 as is?
I would like to start out by thanking everyone on this forum for all of the information here. It is really a gold mine. It has helped me with study for the astb, understanding the process, and nearly everything else to do with gaining my commission.
Now to the situation.
I have a signed DD 368. It is in hand, it was a moment of bliss. However, I just received an email from my recruiter (who is the man) that the digital signature that the army uses are rubbish. I need an old fashioned ink and paper for the navy. NOW, that may not seem like a huge problem seeing as the Army has already said they don't mind if I leave. It just so happens that the policy (any unit can add to the regs) states that a general officer needs to sign on this form. Through the twists and turns of life it happened that a 2 star major general signed off on my form (digitally). It will be extremely hard to get this resigned by the deadline for my packet.
The question,
Is there a snowballs chance that he could be misinformed and we can use the 368 as is?