Well I suppose that's a necessity, otherwise Russia would then be at war with NATO, and that's a huge can of worms to open.Well POTUS just stated on live TV that war with Russia must end before Ukraine will be considered for NATO membership... an interesting wrinkle.
Well POTUS just stated on live TV that war with Russia must end before Ukraine will be considered for NATO membership... an interesting wrinkle.
That’s not a wrinkle. That’s a fundamental principle of consideration for membership.Well POTUS just stated on live TV that war with Russia must end before Ukraine will be considered for NATO membership... an interesting wrinkle.
Not surprising per se - but that the messaging was so distinctly articulated on the Sunday news show media stage. It seems to 1. Give RUS an incentive for continuing the war and of course 2. UKR for ending it.What’s surprising about that to you, Chuck?
And if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle.Imagine a world where Russia was defeated squarely, Putin and his gang meet their maker, the vast food and energy resources of Russia are available to world markets again, and the Russian people pursue the path of Norway - the most well governed society in the history of mankind (my opinion). Giving the world headroom to really go after global electrification of society and not digging carbon from the ground.
Are you advocating for unlimited war against the Putin regime followed by a lengthy occupation to ensure the stability and success of whatever comes next?Imagine a world where Russia was defeated squarely, Putin and his gang meet their maker, the vast food and energy resources of Russia are available to world markets again, and the Russian people pursue the path of Norway - the most well governed society in the history of mankind (my opinion). Giving the world headroom to really go after global electrification of society and not digging carbon from the ground.
You need to read up on things, the bar has been set much lower than that! ?And if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle.
This has been tried. It did not go well.Are you advocating for unlimited war against the Putin regime followed by a lengthy occupation to ensure the stability and success of whatever comes next?
Do you really think Russia was previously unaware of this? I mean, you can’t even have an active territorial dispute and be considered for NATO membership. This is a principle Russia has been exploiting all over their western front for decades.Give RUS an incentive for continuing the war
WTF? Alright, which one of you jokers gave Chuck the psilocybin?Imagine a world where Russia was defeated squarely, Putin and his gang meet their maker, the vast food and energy resources of Russia are available to world markets again, and the Russian people pursue the path of Norway - the most well governed society in the history of mankind (my opinion). Giving the world headroom to really go after global electrification of society and not digging carbon from the ground.
Brett - as a potential Flag officer and a career Naval Officer - do you not have your own ideals that govern your belief system = do you have a vision of how the world "ought to be" and use that to guide your thinking and clarity?WTF? Alright, which one of you jokers gave Chuck the psilocybin?
Yes, Chuck. It’s based in reality though.Brett - as a potential Flag officer and a career Naval Officer - do you not have your own ideals that govern your belief system = do you have a vision of how the world "ought to be" and use that to guide your thinking and clarity?
It helps, when moving towards “what ought to be,” to not put a major nuclear power in a position where it’s doctrinally said that it might let the nukes fly. And Russia is on public record saying “threats to the existence of the Russian state” or words to that effect are one of those things.do you not have your own ideals that govern your belief system = do you have a vision of how the world "ought to be" and use that to guide your thinking and clarity?