LCG - Littoral Corvette, Guided-missileThe LCS wasn't selected for the new FFG program. They should be reclassified as corvettes, but alas.
Easy day. Next question.
LCG - Littoral Corvette, Guided-missileThe LCS wasn't selected for the new FFG program. They should be reclassified as corvettes, but alas.
I agree, I would rather see a warship named for a fighting Sailor over one named for a politician any day.FIFY. I’ll take a cook any day if it happens to be a cook who was awarded the Navy Cross and died in service to our country. That’s not meant to come off snippy, and on the topic I appreciate respect for the legacy of other names borne by the class. Constellation is a great example, and there are a ton of CV names out there that would be great to bring back.
In the truest sense of the word I think the LCS could be classed as a frigate. Not every navy mission requires you to be chained to a carrier and coastal work will be needed, small boys dealt with, and maybe even small raids. That said, they will have to lose their "LCS stink."LCS to frigate was certainly a stretch, but it did give them a chance to repurpose into something useful. I don't think there will be a place for a corvette in the US Navy. But we could unload them in FMSs calling them corvettes. They have to lose their LCS stink and lots of counties operate corvette size vessels.
Would need to have a missile and a way to guide it.LCG - Littoral Corvette, Guided-missile
Easy day. Next question.
Norwegian NSM (RGM-184A)Would need to have a missile and a way to guide it.
Not really the same.Norwegian NSM (RGM-184A)
also Hellfire (AGM-114L) as ASuW capability but I can see how that wouldn’t count
Alright. Not falling on my sword for this one. Then let's name it an "LC" for "Littoral Corvette" and call it a day.Not really the same.
The G generally implies an advanced level of integration of ship, missiles, sensors, and associated combat systems, eg AEGIS. Also it seems that the G also tends to align with AW capability.
Does raytheon have their own anechoic chamber? If so, where and how big?
In the truest sense of the word I think the LCS could be classed as a frigate. Not every navy mission requires you to be chained to a carrier and coastal work will be needed, small boys dealt with, and maybe even small raids. That said, they will have to lose their "LCS stink."
LCG - Littoral Corvette, Guided-missile
Easy day. Next question.
Not really the same.
The G generally implies an advanced level of integration of ship, missiles, sensors, and associated combat systems, eg AEGIS. Also it seems that the G also tends to align with AW capability.
Alright. Not falling on my sword for this one. Then let's name it an "LC" for "Littoral Corvette" and call it a day.
USS ParadigmI'm just glad they dropped the idea to name it Agility. Bad enough without naming it after EMBA buzzwords.
Someone else already said...also the RTN webpage lists it out. Always good to know where there are other high demand, low density assets. I spent a few months scouring the states for time in an anechoic facility and never knew this was out there. Eventually my good looks and winning personality got me time in the Pax chamber.Yes. It's bigger than a bread box and somewhere within CONUS.
If you seriously want to know, I can shoot you an e-mail with details.
Depends. Most warships these days are delineated based upon length or tonnage. Being under 400 feet long puts the LCS in the corvette range which isn't a bad thing. We need small ships to handle all of the missions we do that aren't doing ASW or protecting the carrier. A corvette would be perfect for that role. Unfortunately, many of the proposed weapons systems that were supposed to be installed on the LCS either never panned out, got canceled, or are decades away from viability.
You can delineate capabilities via belt colors.USS Lean Six Sigma