One could do worse.live like a hippie in the Columbia River Valley.

One could do worse.live like a hippie in the Columbia River Valley.
Well I think that is good to hear that things have changed (for the better). It seemed a little arrogant to say "we don't want jet trash" especially when we are talking about guys who have excelled throughout training, basically passed the Hornet/Rhino FRS, but just couldn't get the hang of the boat. Glad guys are getting a fair shake nowadays.
No flying anything with "Navy" painted on the side, I asked my Commodore about UAS,
If you are interested in UAS, there are some really good opportunities in the Air Guard right now. Money to fly Reapers, schwack shit heads from 1/2 way around the globe, go home every night, no boats, Launch/Recovery Element deployments for 90 days if you want to go.
I hadn't thought about UAS with the ANG, I will look into it, especially since some of the communities listed as being open for my POCR board don't actually have any openings. I wonder if any of that UAS time is logable?
HAL,I doubt anyone, civilian or military, would count UAV time for anything other than flying UAVs.
The FAA pilot license requirements are not for piloting skills, but for knowing how the airspace works, procedures, etc. If you're going to operate around manned aircraft, you have to know how the manned aircraft operate.
There is a big difference between flying a manned aircraft and flying a UAV.
I'm searching and will keep looking, but I found a study done just a few years ago that asked people the following question:
Assume that at some point in the future the majority of airlines began operating without manned crews (remotely operated), would you pay more for a ticket on a manned flight if that was still a limited option? The overwhelming number of people responded, yes, they would pay more to travel on a flight with people in the cockpit. Me too...