oh God, here we go again. my argument....by your definition (webster's) i would agree that atheism is a "religion". by the same, i could also say that by the same line of reasoning submission wrestling (my style of fighting) is a religion because there is system of beliefs (always go to ground, maintain top control, maintain close quarter, aim to head, aim to rib, hit kidneys when bottom rolls to side, etc) and i have firm faith this is the most effective way to win a fight. in reality do i consider this a religion- no. perhaps a poor analogy but i can think of a million others. "a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith" - that can apply to almost anything. i dont believe that webster's dictionary in this particular case necessarily applies to the real world. religion also encompasses tradition, a heirarchy of people, and a set system of ideals to strive for. atheism doesnt encompass all of these. that doesnt mean it is any less legitimate, it means by my view that it's not a religion as defined by "reality." buddhism (which doesnt view a "God-character") does encompass all those things, and is in fact closer in many ways to Catholicism (my religion) than perhaps any other religion. so there are my supporting arguments.