Remember that the tip is also moving forward through the air. I don't feel like doing the math.
I doubt that'll add much...?
Remember that the tip is also moving forward through the air. I don't feel like doing the math.
Pretty much anybody can look at a turboprop and know that it gets negligible thrust from the exhaust. Compared to a Pilatus or a King Air (both sporting PT6A variants, btw) the T34 has so much more prop noise than turbine noise. Any SWAGs on why?
PT6A is not a single model, but a family of powerplants. Some more powerful than others (just look at T-6 A/B vs. T-34C for instance). Could this have any impact?
I'm more depressed that, 5 years later, I remembered that a T-34 prop turned at 2200rpm without looking it up. I'd go on about what a nerd I am, but it's not like that was a surprise or anything . . .I doubt that'll add much...?
Pretty much anybody can look at a turboprop and know that it gets negligible thrust from the exhaust. Compared to a Pilatus or a King Air (both sporting PT6A variants, btw) the T34 has so much more prop noise than turbine noise. Any SWAGs on why?
Any insight into why beta sounds so different?
Btw I haven't gotten my + rep yet... just sayin'... :icon_smil
so if Vt = stationary tip velocity (263m/s at redline), and
Va= velocity of the aircraft
Vmoving = sqrt(Vt^2 + Va^2)
Which at 190 knots bumps the tip velocity up to 280m/s
I love that sound.
My SWAG would be that it has something to do with a positively cambered airfoil (prop) with a negative AOA (full beta at -5*)? More turbulent flow as a result?
I love that sound.
Any insight into why beta sounds so different?
Btw I haven't gotten my + rep yet... just sayin'... :icon_smil