I am willing to bet the judgment will be reversed based upon the first amendment. Like it or not, everybody enjoys the protections that it affords.
The 1st Amendment is what their arguement was based upon. You cannot desecrate someone's giving their life for their country during a sacred ceremony for their family. The intent of the 1st Amendment is being skewed by these cultist clowns....they are not a church....they are not Baptist.....I am Baptist and can tell you that Christianity does not condone what they are actively doing. I think OJ needs to make a plea deal to save his a$$ by taking out these idiots....I could see that as fair....maybe.My take on the ruling wasn't that they can't say what they want, but they have to be held responsible for what the effect their speech has. As said earlier, wouldn't this fall under the notion of libel and/or slander?
Religious Zealot said:Get this straight -- God put us here to preach to you, and such devices as are needed will be provided by His hand.
Matthew 4:7 said:Jesus said to him, Again, it is written, “You shall not test the Lord your God.”
Religious Zealot said:You want to tout these so-called freedoms these spoiled brats are supposedly fighting to protect, but then you want to imprison, kill, and/or throw out of the country the only people who are exercising those rights with regularity and without compromise.
G.K. Chesterton said:To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.
How bout the hand Bitch slap her blasphemous scraggly-haired pumpkin-head.Quote:
Originally Posted by Religious Zealot
Get this straight -- God put us here to preach to you, and such devices as are needed will be provided by His hand.
He's got a bunch of good ones:Who was it that said, a zealot is someone who does what God would if only He knew the facts of the case?
I dig that Chesterson quote.
G.K. Chesterton said:Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a free man any more than a dog.
The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.
</threadjack>Man is an exception, whatever else he is. If he is not the image of God, then he is a disease of the dust. If it is not true that a divine being fell, then we can only say that one of the animals went entirely off its head . . . Man is always something worse or something better than an animal; and a mere argument from animal perfection never touches him at all. Thus, in sex no animal is either chivalrous or obscene. And thus no animal ever invented anything so bad as drunkenness - or so good as drink.