Also it is easy for me to be all offended when people make fun of us when I get the bonus.
(ELT, this isn't directed to you but leads in to my $.02)
While I can certainly sympathize with those on the other side of the fence when it comes to nukes and our bonuses/pro pay, I find it difficult to believe that they actually believe the things they are saying. To try to determine a pay that a specific rate "deserves" based on "how hard they work" (which is a pretty ambiguous measurement anyway) in relation to another is pretty short sighted.
People can talk about what we deserve all they want to, but to ignore the basic principle of supply and demand is either them being naive or willingly ignorant. The supply of candidates that qualify to enter the training pipeline is rather small compared to most other rates. The demand for nukes is very high due to both the Navy being undermanned as well as the civilian community luring us away with even larger pay checks/better quality of life (again, due to high degree of training required as well as such a limited pool of candidates). As a nuke mechanic, I was able to get orders to any submarine in the fleet that I desired because almost every single M-div is at about 60% manning.
Pay for any job isn't determined based solely on how laborious the job is, especially in relation to another job. How many 2nd and 3rd classes really deserve more than the Marine who is getting shot at on the front lines? The "Pay based on relativity to other jobs" argument is a slippery slope and isn't just limited to nukes vs. the world...