Well, we all know that you are so exceptional that it would not have mattered to the board.I didn't apply for NROTC. I may have mentioned it during the interview, but it's not necessary to apply for it, too.
Well, we all know that you are so exceptional that it would not have mattered to the board.I didn't apply for NROTC. I may have mentioned it during the interview, but it's not necessary to apply for it, too.
Well, we all know that you are so exceptional that it would not have mattered to the board.
I have only been a BGO for two years now so I can't say for sure. But from talking to the other guys in my region, it has been SOP for a while. It is more likely your BGO simply failed to ask.
On the NROTC Board I was on, Applicants to NROTC got docked points (or didn't get extra points) if they applied to more than one program (to include the academy, AFROTC, AROTC, BDCP, etc). It was explained that due to the different programs, we should "reward" those with dedication to one particular program.
Is this a new requirement? When I was interviewed by my BGO (Winter 2003), he never asked me anything about NROTC.
It seems that applying to more than one commissioning source would show a stronger desire to become an officer rather than a lack of dedication.
That is retarded. So, being committed to NROTC is more important than being committed to becoming a Naval Officer.Correct, but the NROTC program is a very different program than the USNA. Dedication to the PROGRAM was the points that we addressed in the application. We'd rather take an individual that WANTED NROTC rather than "I'll take whatever gets me to be an officer."
That is retarded. So, being committed to NROTC is more important than being committed to becoming a Naval Officer.
That is retarded. So, being committed to NROTC is more important than being committed to becoming a Naval Officer.