I just thought the article amusing in that he proposes that the great civilian leaders of America should be studying with military leaders. As Flash and others have pointed out that doesn't work because history has already shown the proclivity of schools to kick off ROTC programs when they become politically unfashionable. Additionally, what's to say the elite universities that currently train our diplomats and business leaders that don't have ROTC programs want them now? I don't see colleges beating down doors as a general proposition to get ROTC units added to their campuses.
There is also the question of logistics. We have 5 perfectly good federal schools with the facilities to train future officers. A lot of schools lack the space or resources to accommodate a new ROTC unit, especially those in urban areas. My senior year I was in an institutional history seminar and I ended up writing a paper on the history of my NROTC unit. I don't know if this requirement is still there, but to take as an example, when my unit was founded in the documents from the Navy the school was required to provide a certain square foot outdoor area for drill. Many urban campuses can't provide that. Additionally, when colleges are planning on adding new facilities to their campuses, even if they wanted a new ROTC unit, do you think that would be a high priority for funding? Somehow I doubt it when they could be adding nicer dorms to attract students, upgrading the school's hospital, making new research facilities to attract grants, etc.