There was a decent discussion of "global warming", "climate change" or whatever the new euphemism is, back in July: http://www.airwarriors.com/forum/showthread.php?t=149643&highlight=climate
Technically, the geomagnetic shift is "overdue," and there is only theoretical speculation as to why it has not occurred yet, or why it occurs at all. The reversals are far from periodic events, although you can pretty much say with certainty that it will occur sometime in the future, and that it has been a relatively very long time since our last reversal.I'm not to worried about Global Warming, Global Dimming seems to be working wonders. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/ Couldn't find the episode but the theory is that particulate pollution is having the same effect as clouds and reflecting a portion of the Sun's energy. As we increase pollution controls reducing the discharge of particulate matter into the atmosphere, more sunlight hits the earth increasing warming at a significant rate.
Doesn't really matter though, the Magnetic shielding of the Earth is estimated to dissappear in about 1500 years so game over anyway. Good thing I've only got about another 40 years or so anyway. Just do a youtube search for "Earth's invisible sheild" National Georaphic.
One interesting question is: will the evidence of crimes committed, such as intentionally making multiple transactions under $10,000 to avoid reporting them, be pursued by those with jurisdiction to enforce such laws? I guess, in spite of the illegal nature in which the information is acquired, its existence should now constitute probable cause for investigation.
I'm not sure that the contents of hacked emails are something that the administrators would entertain on their board. Also, since the content of the 1000+ emails and 70+ documents are hard to come by, one can only go by what is posted elsewhere, in some manner of telephone-hearsay.Huh? which email contained this?
The emails could be construed as academic misconduct, not an outright mustachioed paid conspiracy. This honestly isn't far out of the norm for academic competitiveness.
^^ This.And what you just said highlights the reason why independent peer-reviewed publications are important. Statistics can easily be skewed towards one outcome or the other to prove a specific argument.
I personally don't believe global warming is as bad as it's made out to be but I also find it hard to believe that there would be such a large amount of collusion between the different scientists.
As far as I undersand it, the Earth getting cooler this past decade is a matter of how you turn data sets into global temperature (I know almost nothing about how this is done). Many argue it is still getting warmer.Eh, when it started getting globally colder on average after around 2003 and they changed the term to "climate change" which doesn't really require a theory, because the climate has always changed, that is when I blew the whole thing off anyway.
Also, water vapor is like 95% of all the greenhouse gases in the air and humans only produce like 2-3% of the CO2 that is in the air anyway, so meh, who cares?
Regardless of cause, if Earth gets warmer and sea-levels rise, we lose access to lots of fresh water. I'd say there is generally some interest in that problem.What is the optimal temperature of the earth?
Who is to say that the temperature of the earth 1000 years ago was optimal?
Magnetic shielding of the Earth is estimated to dissappear in about 1500 years
Overdue? 1500 years? Says who? It may be internal fluid dynamics of the core alone that causes the shift. What I'm more inclined to believe, is that large asteroid impacts or the actual slamming of subducted tectonic slabs into the core mantle boundary that causes flow reversal. Depending on who you ask these events are not exactly regular. What is fairly certain is that they will not kill everything on Earth.Technically, the geomagnetic shift is "overdue," and there is only theoretical speculation as to why it has not occurred yet, or why it occurs at all.
However, it does not necessarily mean the end of life. The shift has occurred previously in Earth's past, and not all life went extinct then.
You aren't the first person, scientists included, who has scoffed at the retarded-ness of the NSF. A lot of what they do is legit. Some of it... well...My squadron had a pilot with a degree in Sociology. As a joke he sent in a grant request to the National Science Foundation requesting funding to study "The Mating Habits of the South Florida Beach Bunny". About four months later he gets a letter requesting information on where he wanted his $250,000 in funding to be deposited. I still say he screwed up when he sent a letter back cancelling his request. I say he should have taken the money and written the paper.
My personal standard is the gold standard of environmentalism himself: The Honorable Mr. Albert Gore. So long as I maintain a carbon footprint lower than that of Mr. Gore, I can consider myself to be doing my part to help the environmentFinal thought on subject: Someone needs to get to the airport at Copenhagen & take a photo of all the 747s, DC-10s, A340/330s etc. that will be parked there by heads of state attending the conference. That would graphically depict the hypocrisy of this whole BS process. If those assholes aren't willing to take public transportation to get to Copenhagen, they shouldn't be allowed to attend.
I remember seeing a thing where they measured sunlight after 9/11 and found that without planes the temperature and sun intensity increased significantly.Doesn't really matter though, the Magnetic shielding of the Earth is estimated to dissappear in about 1500 years so game over anyway. Good thing I've only got about another 40 years or so anyway. Just do a youtube search for "Earth's invisible sheild" National Georaphic.