:icon_mi_6 Correct on #2. #3 not close, go west.E5B said:#2 is CRP
#3 looks like the one in the Houston area
:icon_mi_6 Correct on #2. #3 not close, go west.E5B said:#2 is CRP
#3 looks like the one in the Houston area
Way west. Not Texas.E5B said:San Antonio Intl?
#3 Yup, Orange County. #2 is CRP.skidkid said:John Wayne
Correct. :icon_mi_6kray1395 said:Midway?
ghost119 said:What do you guys think about people being able to see an exact layout of the bases and the postions of the aircraft there? I was looking at Fort Hase Cove across the mt range from Honolulu Hawaii. The CH-53's are only 210' from the shore on the SSW side.
pos:
21*26'29.12" N
157*46'05.12" W
It's really irrelevant. The images are not real time, or even current within years oftentimes. Base layout isn't exactly a state secret and is available on most commonly available roadmaps. Having a map of the base isn't the cornerstone of a plan to attack it.ghost119 said:What do you guys think about people being able to see an exact layout of the bases and the postions of the aircraft there? I was looking at Fort Hase Cove across the mt range from Honolulu Hawaii. The CH-53's are only 210' from the shore on the SSW side.
pos:
21*26'29.12" N
157*46'05.12" W
As already stated, images may be up to 3 years old. But, I'm trying to figure out why someone would suggest a potential OPSEC violation, and then go ahead and post very specific details about said threat.ghost119 said:What do you guys think about people being able to see an exact layout of the bases and the postions of the aircraft there?
XX*XX'XX.XX" N
XXX*XX'XX.XX" W
kray1395 said:Midway?